I think its funny he's only been in the Senate for 2 years and thinks he's fit to run this country. Whats even funnier is that the libs agree
2007-01-17 06:00:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Puleeeeezzz. NO more non-participants in the role of Commander-in chief, It's OK to be President,but let's ammend the right to lead the Military,with out "proper" Military training
2007-01-17 14:18:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No military experience whatsoever. That probably qualifies him to win the Democratic nomination.
Didn't Bush volunteer for Guard Service?
2007-01-17 14:15:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Barack has no chance of getting the nomination, let alone the White House.
He has no military experience. I don't believe you need military experience to run this country, it has just been that way most of the time.
2007-01-17 14:04:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Culture Warrior 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Barack Obama did not serve in the military. However, one cannot claim that Bush's record in the Guard is evidence of greater patriotism because he came of age in a time when the draft still existed, and he thus had little choice about whether or not to serve.
2007-01-17 13:59:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
No,he doesn't have any. Here's what I don't get. At this time,with 2 wars going on,the last thing that's needed is someone with very little experience. I'm not saying it shouldn't be a dem,just not that one.
2007-01-17 14:06:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hey! 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Word on the street is he led a Brigade of Mujaheddin successfully knocking out numerous White Russians.
Go big Red Go
2007-01-17 14:07:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
He has no military experience just like the current President. Not showing up for Training does not equal serving. What Military are you thinking about...........
2007-01-17 14:00:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sun Spot 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
Zero, none, naught, zilch
2007-01-17 17:07:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋