"they only want to protect the children in the womb, but not once they're born," then show me the pro-life person who advocates using the various abortion methods (you can look them up) on babies, or other "born" people?
There are reasons to be pro-choice, but isn't this a silly argument?
2007-01-17 05:44:46 · 5 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a completely ridiculous argument. I see no reason to be pro-choice, other than selfishness.
As for not wanting to protect the born, that's total BS. There are plenty of people who want to adopt (and aren't nut jobs).
2007-01-17 05:59:39 · answer #1 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you are assuming these children are not wanted which is false you'd be right. The truth is that there are lots of couples looking for babies to adopt. The newspapers of larger cities always have lots ads from people who will pay the medical expenses and etc. to have a chance to adopt the child. This is information that pro choice people should spreading so that it really is pro-choice.
2007-01-17 06:25:43 · answer #2 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is, especially considering there are a lot more important things going on in this country, and the world for that matter, than to be worrying about things like abortion and gay rights. Lets look at the failing infrastructure, like 80-year-old sewer systems in parts of the country. How is that going to be for the health of these unborn children?
2007-01-17 05:52:45 · answer #3 · answered by Tiffany 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
we need to start ignoring this debate when it comes to politics. I think the is much more pressing matter here and around the world that needs attention.
2007-01-17 06:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
So you think it is ok to kill a baby? That is creepy.
2007-01-17 05:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by Buffman316 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋