http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/150107gulfoftonkin.htm
2007-01-17 05:42:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think they got past that just before the WMD incident.
2007-01-17 05:47:36 · answer #1 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and possibly no more valid than the WMD argument for Iraq. I will grant the benefit of the doubt to both Johnson and Bush that they really did believe what they were told, at least at the time they took action on it.
2007-01-17 11:38:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. But Johnson was different. He was a Dem.
We don't need an incident to invade Iran. We need about 7 or 8 more U. N. resolutions that Iran snubbs.
2007-01-17 05:49:12 · answer #3 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and that was under a DEMOCRATIC president. It is easy to criticize bush isn't it?
It is easy to talk from the cheap seats.
2007-01-17 08:58:06 · answer #4 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why invade? 20-25 nukes should do the trick.
2007-01-17 05:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by crazyhorse19682003 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
all of us Viet Nam vets are
2007-01-17 06:08:28 · answer #6 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This American is, yes.
2007-01-17 05:54:53 · answer #7 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋