I would not marry a woman who did not demonstrate that after marriage, a husband comes first, before her children.
That is supported by the Bible and it works both ways, after God, the man should come before anyone else in the wife's life. Likewise, the woman should come before anyone else in the husband's life.
This is not to say children are to be ignored. Instead, children are to be groomed to leave the nest. A big part of that is modeling a healthy marriage for the children so they know what to do when they marry.
If mom is too busy with the kids to work on her marriage, then the kids get a poor model. She may think she is being a good mom. Instead, she has modeled less than ideal behavior.
I know most mothers will not accept this, as the urge to mother is very strong. However, I will not marry a woman who cannot demonstrate that she is willing and able to put her husband before all others, her children included.
Nor would I expect a woman to marry me if I couldn't demonstrate that I could put her before all others as well.
2007-01-17 05:35:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by camys_daddy 5
·
4⤊
5⤋
What are you really saying? Are you serious?
You don't think that a mother single or not should put her children first? Are you crazy?
First of all the love for your children is and should be different from that of your partner. It's because of this,the way some men see there daughter's in the same liking as their wives why they molest them.
secondly Your children will always be your children and may well be the only ones you'll see in a couple of years if the relationship doesn't workout. Men come and they go but your children are forever even if they die they still will be your children. men on the other hand if they leave and go to someone else get married or just decide to leave is no longer yours.
There is nothing that can separate a mother from her child not death and surly not adoption because even if a mother gives her child up for adoption at the end of the day she is still that child's mother.
(don't get it twisted)
My child will always be number one but nothing is wrong with having two number ones My husband/man will be number one as well even if he's not my child's father because one can't replace the other if you know what i mean. My spouse and my son needs different things from me and i need different things from them.
Hope you understand my point.
2007-01-17 05:48:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by beautiful 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
A woman's kids from a previous relationship need to be her #1 responsibility. If a man can't understand and accept that then he should never enter this type of relationship. Your mother did the right thing, it's just too bad you grew up so insecure. Why would you make a woman choose you as being more important than her kids? A woman can be committed to you and her kids, and she shouldn't have to pick. You should also understand that kids need to feel secure about their mothers love as well. What happens if she puts you first and then you leave in 2 years, then she remarries, etc. You can't blame the divorce on the mom who may have put her kids first. I'd blame it on the husband for having unrealistic expectations of the woman's responsibility to her children. If the mother remarries a third time, should this man of the hour come first again? This is ridiculous. Don't get involved with a single mom unless you are willing to understand her responsibilities and respect them. My stepfather loved my mom and never would have made her choose. He realized she had priorities and also knew she had the ability to love her kids and him. You sound needy and immature. Don't date single mothers. Good luck to you!
2007-01-17 05:58:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Swim Mom 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
As a mother period, your kids come first. When you are a single parent it is a slippery slope that you are on when it comes to romance. You can only hope to find someone who is of the same understanding when it comes to your children. I am currently with a man who has a daughter from a previous marriage, we both understand that our children come first and foremost. We also both understand that what we have is special and will take work to make this family work too. He loves his little girl with all his heart and my son is my whole world and we do what we can to make it work. Sometimes plans don't go as they are supposed to but that happens whether you are a single parent or a married couple with kids.
I love his daughter like she were my own and my son will call him daddy (when he learns how to talk) and will always know him as his father. Bringing together ready made families is hard work but when you love each other enough there is no mountain you can't climb together.
I know this may be a little "rose-colored glasses" for some but it is how I was raised and how I will raise our children
2007-01-17 05:47:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
When a woman becomes a single mother, there is someone, (or multiple someones) that depend on her. The child becomes he reason for doing everything she does. Every decision she makes will affect the child, so she has to live her life accordingly. Single fathers are the same way. That doesn't mean that there isn't room for a spouse, but when you are focused on that welfare and well-being for so long, I imagine it's hard to shift those feelings to another person.
2007-01-17 07:15:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lemme tell ya... 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Children do come first. In the case of second marriages, the children were there first anyway. The second husband has to realize when he takes on a woman with children that they have a responsibility to those children. If a man cant accept it, then he found the wrong person to be with. It would be unnatural and destructive for a woman to choose her new husband over her children. There are many good men out there who know this and accept it as a fact of life.
2007-01-17 05:55:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tink 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
when you marry (typically) it's man and wife and then come the kids. As a mom of 2, i can say that if i had to choose my hubby over kids- it would be the kids and here's why. before the kids- as adults he could take care of himself. the kids didn't ask to be born we choose to have them. they are not capable of taking care of themselves. he can . and as a single mom- the kids depend on the parent they are with primarily b/c thats all thas left. they have no--one else that would feed,cloth,nuture them.it is a tough spot and various opions will come to you. Yes without that first man/hubby thekids wouldn otbe here and some believe that it was "me and him; first and then the kids and true as that is- again the kids did not ask to be born so when they are thr priorities dont change they are just positioned differently. it's not that the single mom loves the new man any less then the first one (or father) it's that she has a responsibilty that she will carry for her for life raising those kids- and if am an comes along in the furure he has to be willing to realize she canl ove him too- but the kids areof her flesh,her bllod, and she is their sole support. as the second man coming along-you need toknow that she loves you, it may not be shown in the same manner as a woman with no children who does not have to worry about a sitter for a long weekend, or who's going to pay for the diapers. It's not easy dating a person with kids by any means i think it's harder then dating another single person b/c you are in effect taking on someone with "accessories" and her priority if she's decent are those kids.
2007-01-20 20:33:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by KATHEYCARCRASHER 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think you have alot to learn about love and relationships in general. First, there are all kinds of love- love for yourself- which is important in being able to accept others into your life, love for your significant other, and love for children, love for family and friends. Each type of love is different and important on its own merit and stands alone- one is not MORE IMPORTANT than another. A parent-child relationship is unlike a partner-partner relationship and has different dynamics. You should respect it, and not be jealous of it- which is what it sounds like. A woman who is well-balanced can love her children and provide them the needs they require, while loving a partner and also providing that partner their needs. Each person's needs are just as important as the other's in a family and need to be addressed. Because children cannot fend for themselves and cannot provide those needs themselves it often seems that the mother puts them first. A real, loving MAN who has become a step-parent to those children should recognize that and be able to step in and help in providing those needs as well. Perhaps then the mother is not always the one running the children's aid. Your view on parenting is childish and selfish and I would hope that there are no children in your future, because you sound as though you would not provide any emotional support for them as you would require all of the attention for yourself.
2007-01-17 07:42:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jennifer S 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
If the single mother puts God first, everthing else will fall into the proper order. We a lot of us don't realize is that it was for God's pleasure that we are here.
The kids come first, but not before the husband. We do have to raise our children and provide for them because they can't do it themselves. Personally, if I were married, my husband would be 2nd to God. The kids come after. However, I will not choose between a man and my children. My children are 2nd to God until a husband comes in.
That is why I am not married cause I don't want to deal with this right now. I am being prepared for marriage.
2007-01-17 05:39:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
properly it fairly is because of the fact I beleive there's a loop hollow interior the Council tax reward / Housing reward rules. If the guy purely keeps to be 3 nights its ok and she or he remains single !! If he keeps to be 4 or greater they're a pair. somebody will tell me if I even have the timescale incorrect. i exchange into at a acquaintances the different day and she or he produce different travellers besides it seems the customer and his spouse do not stay mutually for assorted the week as they are able to't have the money for to, he keeps to be at his fathers and "visits" his spouse so she claims reward as a single determine. I advised my buddy if i discover out their surname and handle i will record them to the council. Its the councils faults . i'm a single determine with the aid of divorce entitled to no reward of any description I artwork complete time and hate my taxes getting used for the variety of element.
2016-10-31 09:03:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋