topgun I don't mean to hurt your feelings but that is just as raciest as i've heard yet. I dream of a day when a man is judged not by the color of his skin but the content of his character! I would write your name in on the ballot before I chose to vote that way.
2007-01-17 05:23:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Realistically, when was the last time you saw either party nominate either a black (or any other minority) or a female. It will be a white male.
Idealistically however, the Republicans would be smart nominating a black female but Condi isn't the right person and she hardly has the guts to take a swing at the ball.
So back to reality. Congressman Ron Paul is the only prospective Presidential candidate who completely supports the United States Constitution, and has a history of doing so, regardless of party politics or poltical winds. All the other candidates, who swore to uphold and defend the United States Constitution, are highly suspect at best.
2007-01-17 05:27:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
surely it would be the white male. traditionally that's who the country has been run by. America is afraid of a woman being president let alone a black president. as far as republican or democratic, it doesn't matter, as long as its a white male. nothing has change.even if all the black people vote and all the white people vote,and all the Chinese,Hispanics,Asians,etc. vote, you have the majority of Hispanics and blacks in jail or has a criminal record which doesn't allow them to vote. that makes the odds in favor of a white male president than for any other race becoming president.
2007-01-17 06:00:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by black pharoahs of egypt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama is a Democrat. Democrats... The party in want of minorities anticipate Obama to do for them. And as OUR president, and a Democratic rep, that should be a concern of his. Poverty and the monetary disaster that we are in in the present day are 2 of the most major themes we are confronted with in the present day in us of a of america. And his plans for come to a decision are a surprising component of the reason why he gained election. that isn't any longer about being black. that is about what Obama stood for. and that i do imagine there'll be advancements. The indications I see so in many cases on college structure information superhighway sites telling me that the project is funded by technique of the reinvestment act is fantastic to me. I in basic terms imagine human beings do not understand how below sea factor us of a of america is in the present day. that is going to take time to restoration our mess.
2016-10-15 09:00:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate to say it but we all know, that a man would be in office before a woman. The Black man beats the woman. The government is not ready to let woman take over quite yet, women are in the government but they are not that high up as president, that will take time.
2007-01-17 11:28:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
either one of the men would win. this country is not ready for a female president. Not saying the job wouldn't be done correctly. Just saying Wont happen!! Maybe in another 100 years..
2007-01-17 05:24:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by TONY 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A male. Because he and all the other males out there are the ones saying "I don't want a women president who's PMSing once a month and launches nukes at the first person that makes her mad."
2007-01-17 05:24:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am looking forward to it. The hiprocracy of democrats is going to be expose to the people in the primarys. There is going to be a war among white femenist and african-american.
2007-01-17 05:42:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
black male repub
or
white female repub would win
if repubs had the guts to nominate them
2007-01-17 05:19:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by anonacoup 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
for crying out loud, this is like one of those high school math problems. My head hurts.
2007-01-17 05:20:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by mei-lin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋