In any Civil case filled in Indian court the petitioner may not be present in court in person & can always be represented by an Advocate, but the petitioners presence is definitely required at the time of his/her personal witness or he can request the court to allow him or her to be get his or her witness recorded in presence of the commissioner appointed by the court for recording the evidence of the petitioner on his/her cost for appointment of such commissioner. As far reconciliation process via video conferencing is concerned it will be for the concerned court to decide & allow this if it thinks just , reasonable & in interest of the justice to do so & this cost of this the petitioner who request it will have to bear .
2007-01-17 18:00:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by bisexualmale s 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
It depends on where you are. In India video conf. is not admissible and it is better for you to be present in the court to protect your interests even if you are represented by an advocate
I believe in the USA it is easier and advocates can do the job- for a fee..
2007-01-17 13:15:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is always best to be there in person. However, if you are unable to do so, you may have an attorney (advocate) there in your stead.
Rules vary from state to state, so consult with an attorney to make sure you are able to appear telephonically or by representative.
2007-01-17 13:29:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Smartest Boy on Earth 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is always best to be there in person. However, if you are unable to do so, you may have an attorney (advocate) there in your stead.
Rules vary from state to state, so consult with an attorney to make sure you are able to appear telephonically or by representative.
2007-01-17 13:12:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Starla_C 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would like to know that one to.
2007-01-17 13:12:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Step 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
DO YOU HAVE OTHER IMPORTANT THINGS IN MIND.
2007-01-18 01:03:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋