When the Democrats offer up emotionless puppets of the party such as Gore and Kerry there was little option. However looking at the economy and wealth of the country now and comparing it to 2000 electing Bush was the best thing the people of the USA could do.
2007-01-17 05:12:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is only one fortune in the necessity to respond to, and act upon issues, through the unfortunate feel of need by some to do misdeeds, by way of hateful and extremist events of action, that leads us to find reason to combat them, and these misdeeds have shown themselves to be only terrorism.
Wouldn't you find it to make sense in understanding that the one and only soldiering for fortune that comes from this response, is peace and prosperity for all, globally?
I would feel more fortunate in and with your reference as to vote in this manner, rather than to face the the highly likely, more terroristic events of misfortune, that have, and to a higher degree moreso would, have taken place without this vote, in all respects to such topic.
What are your understandings as to the definitions of soldier and fortune anyways?
2007-01-17 13:15:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Garret Tripp 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because the competition was not as good---where were the "head" democrats when they were bitchin bout Floridas' chads? There was nothing but silence from ...Kennedy..jackson...clinton...Rendel(head of the DNC at the time) and the list goes on.. The election ended up exactly where the Rep./Dem wanted it. And you thought you really had a voice !
2007-01-17 13:14:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by arthur d 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
And the candidate in 2004 received 3 purple hearts for his combat actions in Vietnam and yet has not significant injuries?
2007-01-17 13:07:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Colonel 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Lets see, because he is a much better leader than either Al "the blob" Gore or John "flip-flop" Kerry.
2007-01-17 13:15:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by slodana2003 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The very first poster has provided for us one of the starkest contradictions I have ever seen. He says black people are monkeys. Within that sentence he bestows the description of human being, "people" and monkey on black people. Monkeys are not people and people are not monkeys so his statement is ludicrously preposterous.
2007-01-17 13:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Immortal Cordova 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
We didn't. How can you claim that Bush is both a deserter & a soldier of fortune. Make up your mind. Which is it?
2007-01-17 13:09:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because the American people got tired of a "do nothing" wimp like Bill Clinton
2007-01-17 13:08:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
because Democrats could not even select a better candidate.
Almost 7 years had gone by, Liberals still whine.... Amazing!
2007-01-17 13:05:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Quickie 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
because of his father
2007-01-21 11:03:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by jerry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋