Does practicing/researching science kill one's creativity?

Question

is it possible to be a creative engineer or creative scientist? if so, then what will be the approach?
if not, how to control one's creativity before entering serious scientific research?

Answer 1

Sometimes. Procedure becomes so natural, that you tend not to do things outside of it, and it can sometimes limit one's thinking patterns similarly to mathematical equations and the like. Personally I don't find using mathematics as a very viable method for universal exploration. What really makes one think that they can define the universe using that one system? It's often they find "anomalies" which are basically differences that cannot be explained mathematically (usually dealing with quantum physics and the behavior of spacetime). They believe that they simply haven't found the proper equation yet, but I believe that it is because that it isn't a good method of understanding the universe as a whole. If we even hold the faculties or senses to be able to experience the universe as a whole. But people's ambitions suit them, they will do what they will. Scientific research doesn't always kill the creativity though. Biological experiments call for a lot of creativity in their approach to the environment, in different ways of testing something until they get a logical conclusion. Usually the method isn't "proving" anything, but simply disproving enough other variables until they can feel relatively confident that their answer is the only answer to the question. So yes and no basically.

Answer 2

i think if you remember to do creative none scientific things with some of your work it would actually help you. i mean you could scientifically create something new by using science and your own creativity. so i have to say No i don't think it does. at least not in less you let science rule your life.

Answer 3

hello, as I incredibly have entered severe college I incredibly have rapidly suggested that having a creative ingredient of arranged to pursue an creative profession is frowned upon. My college district (Clovis Unified) desires the very suitable academically. that's comprehensible, yet they stifle us with a lot artwork and rigidity, that we as youngsters don't get to thrill interior the completed journey of formative years.I had a custom with my counselor and my father a on the same time as decrease decrease back, and whilst the counselor asked what i wanted to do whilst i grew to develop into into older. I reported that i might choose to pursue a song profession. that concept grew to develop into into shot down interior the present, somewhat replaced with a enterprise profession pathway. I incredibly have now purely slowly stopped irritating approximately my college artwork and concentrated extra on what i incredibly savour doing, collaborating in guitar and writing. i might somewhat do something i'm getting exhilaration from and make little money than do something i hate and make a super form of money. Iam a 14 365 days previous student and that i might choose to care much less approximately being suitable or being effectual in "their" eyes.

Answer 4

Not as a serious, paying career. Though I have seen scientists who still practice art as a hobby. Most artists have some rudimentary interest in science as well. But as yet, I haven't seen any practical careers that comprise a fusion of both.

Answer 5

Yes. The creative side of science is called engineering. Architects, for example, are very creative. (Or they strive to be.)

Answer 6

Methinks researching science wouldn't kill your creativity. There's nothing wrong with seeing things in its whole.

Answer 7

No it does not. Creative inspires alot people to do research. Don't stop being creative, don't stop asking and how.

Answer 8

No but research has shown that people who do any work that recuires a lot of brain activity are more likely to develope brain canncer than hard laborers

Answer 9

Not in the Evolutionist. They are very creative with Darwin's theory.

Answer 10

Lil I doubt that ^_^. I don't like science very much, though, and I think that those who research it have a lot of different opinions. Each to his own, I guess