2007-01-17 04:14:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
yes i agree the only good show WWE currently has.
2007-01-17 04:19:09 · answer #1 · answered by RaizenX 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In some ways it is because it is a wrestling show. They don't have any celebrities on it, and they dont have any stupid gimmicks eating into the wrestling time.
Raw undoubtedly has the better superstars though. Smackdown only has a few top draws (undertaker, kane, batista, benoit, kennedy) and most of them are fan favourites. Kennedy is the only top draw heel!
If ECW was cancelled and all their top talent went to Smackdown (RVD, Lashley, Monty Brown, CM Punk, Test) then Smackdown would be the best US brand. I currently rank them;
Ring of Honor
TNA
Smackdown
Raw
ECW
2007-01-18 01:59:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to tell. theyre both so bad now.
Smackdown has more talented wrestlers like Booker, Kane, Taker, benoit, but they put them in matches with losers like Miz or MVP and i cant get interested.
RAW just has HBK and Edge now that are any good. But they do have the IC matches. The Intercontinental matches with Jeff, Nitro, Carlito, or Shelton are the only wwe matches i watch anyway. I've just stopped watching wrestling other than TNA and the Raw IC matches
2007-01-17 12:24:57 · answer #3 · answered by anonymous w 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown is better than raw becasue the gm is fair that raw's gm
2007-01-17 12:49:58 · answer #4 · answered by JESSIE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smackdown has always been better, wherever Undertaker is, it simply is mouth watering. And Kane of SAME show. What can i say?
2007-01-17 12:20:51 · answer #5 · answered by qwerty123456 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
R U KIDDIN ME? u think dat smackdown iz better dan RAW...COMMMON...da only good wrestlers on smackdown are: Batista, Undertaker, Kane,Matt Hardy, Mr.Kennedy(dunt like him dat much but he can fight). that's it but on RAW u have John Cena, HHH, HBK (DX) JTG, Shad (Cryme Tyme), Mickie James, Jeff Hardy and lots more.etc...
2007-01-17 18:13:41 · answer #6 · answered by Ally "Allize" Cena 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not me smackdown does have the better wrestlers or they dont have the better rivalrys the only good thing bout smackdown is batista,paul london & brian kendrick, undertaker,and kane
2007-01-17 12:20:52 · answer #7 · answered by ynkeh8r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES, Raw is trying to be better by bring Great Kali to beat the hell out of cena
2007-01-17 13:39:25 · answer #8 · answered by Texans Fan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say yes it is. It has less focus on divas and talking in the ring for 20 mins about nothing and more focus on matches. Smackdown! gives you more matches in the same time frame b/c they cut out the nonsense. Now if the Boogieman would just go away the show would be perfect.
2007-01-17 12:22:48 · answer #9 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no way smackdowns biggest stars are the undertaker kane and batista and only batista is utilised properly where on raw there all the big names like cena ,hhh ,michaels,flair,jeff hardy etc and you see them in action every week.
2007-01-17 12:19:35 · answer #10 · answered by pj 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think smackdown is better only because Batista is on it. He's gorgeous.
2007-01-17 13:47:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋