I think it is apparent that RAW needs to remain it's own prgram, but what about Smackdown! and ECW. Right ECW is about as good as Sunday Night Heat and I think the additional stars would help Smackdown!'s roster b/c they lost Orton and Lashley and Undertaker doesn't wreslte as much as he once did. I think it would be interesting to see. What are your thoughts?
2007-01-17 04:09:50 · 7 answers · asked by WHEELJACK 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I am glad that I now know that someone else out there agrees with me. I have been telling friends that Smackdown and ECW should just become one for a few months now. I just don't think that ECW is going anywhere but down so it would be logical to just add their stars to the Smackdown roster and improve that show.
2007-01-17 04:30:27 · answer #1 · answered by space 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's a smart idea, man! ECW is dead, since the removal of Paul Heyman. I would put CM Punk, RVD, Lashley, Sabu, Hardcore Holly, Test, Striker and Monty Brown on Smackdown. Release the rest of them.
Begin "phasing-out" older stars such as Finlay (47), Booker T (42) and The Undertaker (41), so these guys can take the helm as the Superstars of Smackdown.
2007-01-17 13:15:34 · answer #2 · answered by Arnold 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Smackdown is currently the best show WWE has and they shouldn't mess with it because they have great matches. ECW is a failure enough just let ECW die
2007-01-17 12:16:13 · answer #3 · answered by RaizenX 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They should cancel ECW, But only put their stars on smackdown. ie. rvd, lashley, test etc.
2007-01-17 12:20:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ECW has been a failure and they should just cancel ECW and give all thier starts to SD! TRhink about it Punk and RVD on SD!
2007-01-17 23:24:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they might as well their live tours are both companies anyway.
2007-01-17 13:51:47 · answer #6 · answered by Nate 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they should!
2007-01-17 12:20:25 · answer #7 · answered by Dominique(G-9) 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋