2007-01-17 03:53:43 · 24 answers · asked by Uno 2 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
One only could wish they had the same passionate anger towards terrorists that they do towards Bush, the Republicans, and the rest of us "idiot Nazi warmongering greedy" Neo-Cons and Cons.
One can only wish they questioned the motives of the Iraqi insurgents, Iran and North Korea with as much gusto as they question the motives of "halliburton oil puppet chimphitler" President Bush.
And of course they insult you, after all, by disagreeing with their obviously intelligent and perfect opinions, you have shown yourself to be, quite obviously, an evil, greedy, hateful idiot, who deserves to be insulted.
Attached are some links to old articles that give food for thought.
2007-01-17 04:13:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 10⤋
no more than any other political party member.
the notion of name calling as a disarming factor in a debate over any issue just proves the ignorance of the one hurling the insults and is not exclusive to librals ,besides there are many people in every party ,to include the whole in the statments of one or a few is allowing yourself to be suprised by the one manuvering and collecting information while you are distracted.
2007-01-17 04:07:05 · answer #2 · answered by matthew_yelle 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I am not a liberal. I do not think a $9 trillion debt is good for America. I am a progressive. Some liberals are getting very tired of Un educated and un informed people like GW Bush.With no clue.
BTW, I have been called every name in the book by Republicans, they have personally attacked me many times. That Started in 1966 when I opposed the escalation of the war in Viet Nam, at that time we only had 2800 dead, we lost 58,000 in the end.
2007-01-17 04:08:35 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
The liberals dont show compassion well, however I prefer the approach they use to that of the White republicans....you know, a rope and a bible and a good ole hanging. Unless your a southern republican, then you hang the black folk without even a bible....but its all in Gods name so its A - OK. Or the conservative Catholic preist who shows his by molesting little boys. At least the Dems have the right ideas, unlike the rest of the imbread, holy rolling, tuckfards out there.
2007-01-17 04:02:06 · answer #4 · answered by Dan G 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋
I think you got your answer from the liberals! Not to generalize, but I have noticed a trend...when there is no legitimate point...that's what happens.
2007-01-17 04:07:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The whole point of any adversarial system is to have dissenting opinions on both sides. To say otherwise implies we are simply a nation of bumbling, mindless sycophants, which we are not.
As for compassion, it is best saved for the defenseless lambs, not the wolves, like Bush and his cronies.
2007-01-17 03:57:45 · answer #6 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
do neocons show compassion for immigrants, katrina victims and war torn families
2007-01-17 04:10:30 · answer #7 · answered by reubthedem 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Being Liberal is one of the most elitist, exclusive but still somehow enlightened things you can be.
2007-01-17 04:00:27 · answer #8 · answered by C B 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Both sides have become less tolerant in their beliefs and passion of politics.
2007-01-17 04:27:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No more than Conservatives. I am a liberal and have been called every name in the book on here by Conservatives.
2007-01-17 03:56:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋