if WCW was still in business will they be better than TNA or WWE?

Answer 1

it's hard to tell, the wreslters they had would all be retired or old now. So it would depend on the new talent as well as storylines.

If it was still around though, even as bad as it was at times during the last year, i think it would be better than most wwe shows. Probably Tna too. Remember wcw brought the high impact cruiserweight style to the US. They had better talent than wwf, but less mic skills. And they had better mic skills than tna but probably not as much talent.

I think people hear all of the wwe "wcw bashing" and forgot how good they were for discovering new talent. wwe has been carried by wcw talent the last few years (Booker, Rey, Eddie, Finlay, Gregory Helms, Benoit, Big Show, Jericho,Chavo, etc.)

As bad as wwe has looked, they'd definitely be in the running. I'm still not sure about tna, though. I think TNA is the best thing in wrestling in at least 2 years.

Answer 2

it would be worse i mean giving the belt to Vicne Russo or David arqqtte that was an f***ing joke to wrestling. Dude why the hell who DDP do that WCW had good wreslters but like wwe never really cared for them. I mean the 5 move talentless freak Goldberg won like crazy when others would work harder than alot other people. But it would have died again anyways

Answer 3

It's tough to say. The company had started to go downhill before it was bought out. Only if they have the same creative team that brought us story lines like the nWo and the battles between Luger, Sting and the 4 Horseman would they be better. Otherwise probably not.

Answer 4

For sure better than TNA.

WWE will always be the best.

00100 Internet fans!!