How many children did George Bush orphaned today ?
2007-01-17 03:37:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can't see that they are unless they are sleeping around the OPEC oil fields and pipelines.
2007-01-17 03:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 16⤊ 3⤋
We dance around the issue by saying, "President Bush didn't orphan anyone today," or "ask the insurgents who are killing innocent by-standers in the street." The central fact remains, these things did not occur until the United States unilaterally "liberated" Iraq. I am sure the average Iraqi did not worry about being shot, kidnapped or tortured in their own home five years ago. They may not have been the richest people in the world, but they survived the way their families had for generations, without incident. Sure, Saddam tortured his fair share of Iraqis, but the average Iraqi citizen had nothing to fear from Saddam. Let's face it, if you left him alone, then he left you alone; quid pro quo.
In the final analysis, let's keep our eye on the proverbial ball, instead of looking for fault elsewhere. I hope to the gods that one day IF the United States is "liberated" some distant media, and nay-sayers, doesn't downplay the violence here as being the locals' fault.
2007-01-17 03:49:28 · answer #2 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes the majority are.Why don't you ask a real question like how many were killed by Muslim hate? Or how many died while you spout meaningless crap instead of standing and helping in the settlement of this situation? Or how about how many will die if we turn our backs on a people that have suffered for years as we stood silent and watched? Or maybe why does America turn her back on the oppressed of the world when she has the power to help?
2007-01-17 04:23:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you ask your question to the Iraqi's killing each other in the streets of Baghdad. And President Bush didn't make anyone an orphan today.
2007-01-17 03:42:35 · answer #4 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
simply by fact the terrorists objective women and little ones to attempt to interrupt the spirits of the Iraqis. however the individuals of Iraq have now desperate to stand against evil like that and combat against terrorists who objective harmless human beings like this.
2016-12-12 13:34:26 · answer #5 · answered by slagle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is a much more dangerous country after overthrowing Saddam. What with Suicide Bombings, rouge militias, US military mistaking you for an insurgent, etc. Saddam, as bad as he was, kept the country from erupting in violence.
2007-01-17 03:46:15 · answer #6 · answered by greencoke 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
very serious question posed by you. really you are great. your social sympathy should be exposed to whole universe. just because of Bush's wishes, Iraq is going to be remained with bushes. Oh God save that nation. let the peace and Renaissance to explore in Iraq. (not oil to explore)
2007-01-17 03:44:57 · answer #7 · answered by adraya 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If they aren't safe now, think how they will be in a couple of years after the democrats abandon Iraq, and leave it to Anarchy.
2007-01-17 03:46:20 · answer #8 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
War is so sad, sad, sad.
I don't understand why people feel the need to annihilate each other.
It doesn't fix problems, it only makes widows and orphans.
2007-01-17 03:42:05 · answer #9 · answered by sexmagnet 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
This is an absurd question. There are more than just of few of us out here that are tired of people like you exploiting the plight of children, whether in Iraq or here! You are not at all concerned about the welfare of children, you simply use them to try to make your point! PEOPLE DIE IN WAR, what is it about that is so difficult for you to understand?
2007-01-17 03:45:42 · answer #10 · answered by rosi l 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Some are, but they can't sleep due to all of the bombs going off outside.
2007-01-17 03:42:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋