I'm more curious to find out how idiotically stupid and ignorant some people can be.
Today, Rosie Odonnell said this EXACT sentence and I could've slapped the fat cow for lying to so many people. I'd like to think that most have a mind of their own and not believe her, but I thought I'd find out just how many are nothing but followers of the liberal religion.
Oh yeah, and I totally support the opinions of Elisabeth Hasselbeck!
2007-01-17 03:36:58 · 8 answers · asked by me 3 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Yes you did so.
In response to Q&A Queen:
Saddam actually killed many of his opponents, but during his era there was no home war like situation at all as of now. A common man was much at peace.
2007-01-17 21:20:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Typical Rosie. Always wrong. It is estimated that Saddam Hussein killed up to two million of his own people. Of the 30,000 Iraqi's killed since troops entered Iraq, many of them were killed by other Iraqis.
In a wider birth, it's just a stupid comparison. The US has been around for over 200 years. Saddam was in power for 35.
If you compare the last 35 years of US history with the years Saddam was in power, I bet she's still wrong.
2007-01-17 03:59:14 · answer #2 · answered by JB 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the rustic were under his dictatorship for over 20yrs,the west knew how the folk lived,enable's settle for it,he gassed a pair of thousand yrs in the past,yet nonetheless carried on being a frontrunner.the U. S. purely incredibly went in using oil.If the west have been incredibly in touch with regard to the scientific care of persons in distinctive international locations,why have not they long gone into Darfaw,the place the Arabs are wiping anybody out.Your possibly splendid,going into Iraq has spiralled way uncontrolled,its no longer as though anybody interior the midsection east cares for Westerners besides.
2017-01-01 06:05:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have killed a lot. When you look at past experiences in countries like vietnam and korea, and then factor in all the innocent people we killed during WWII with our 2 nuclear bombs, we probablly have killed more innoccent people than Hussein.
2007-01-17 03:49:16 · answer #4 · answered by lucky_wonka 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't think so. That is, if you're referring to deaths directly resulting from American military action.
However, I've seen some opinion that the level of daily violence in Iraq is now approaching what it was during Saddam's rule.
2007-01-17 04:54:19 · answer #5 · answered by Q&A Queen 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rosie is an idiot....but Bush just might be a bigger one.
2007-01-17 04:17:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was innocent?
2007-01-17 03:44:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK.. And.. He was not at war with his victims!
2007-01-20 20:50:25 · answer #8 · answered by BigWashSr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋