we r not satisfied with what we have. and we need to make our earth appears more beautiful by making comparisons with them with which we should not make,
but i think that astronomers follows the well said saying "other side appears always green."
2007-01-17 04:15:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by surbhi 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have some question, so do others. You are trying to find yours and others there. I don't see anything wrong with that.
No body is unaware how precious and beautiful the earth is but as being the humans we need to keep our minds racing to such creative and wonderful deeds so that it does not go blank and the unknown questions could be answered to completely understand the humans and the beautjful planet earth itself.
And also the population has gone so much up that we need to look for other resources for the use of humans so that humans can survive more than planned by the nature.
2007-01-17 04:17:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by ashutosh ddn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your assumption is in error.
December of 1968 the crew of Apollo 8- Borman , Lovell and Anders- took what is possibly the most significant picture in human history; They took a picture of the Earth from lunar orbit. Prior to that no one had ever seen the whole Earth as it appears from space. The Earth appeared as it really was ; a blue and white planet floating alone in the extreme blackness of space.
If that picture doesn't illustrate the preciousness of this planet then nothing does
2007-01-17 04:47:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it truly is extraordinarily likely, virtually particular that in this really tremendous Universe there is different existence. it truly is in order that massive. Edit: " yet when there are different civilizations accessible that arose from the primordial ooze, there is particular to be some that stepped ahead properly earlier than people. Ergo, they could have get admission to to machines and technologies that would want to enable them to commute prodigious distances in area in a couple of minutes" we are no longer even positive if it truly is plausible, and how might want to alien existence, inspite of in the journey that they possessed such technologies, discover us? they could properly be on the different fringe of the Universe, they could have died out some time previous after we were only micro organism, lets properly be the most stepped ahead or the least... besides the undeniable fact that the point nonetheless stands that they could properly be in an entire distinct galaxy astronomically some distance away that the does no longer imagine to go back right here. You shoot your self in the foot right here: "it truly is not a reality- it truly is a medical idea." and " It only doesn't upload up" is only an challenge from incredulity.
2016-11-24 23:15:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
*Sorry this is so long, but I thought you deserved a complete answer.*
By studying other planets in our solar system, we are learning more about our own planet. The moon, for example, can tell us all about the geological formation history of the earth. Learning more about geology in general from the other planets can tell us about the formation of the entire solar system and more specifically about the formation of our own planet.
The sun, through it's solar wind, is always spewing Helium 3 isotopes which the Earth isn't very good at absorbing, but the moon's soil does absorb very well. If we could harvest this from the moon, it could be a great source of energy, helping our energy crisis on Earth.
Prominent lunar scientist Alan Binder has also suggested large arrays of solar panels on the moon which, of course, doesn't have the space problems and weather problems we have on earth, and perhaps shipping that solar energy back to earth somehow.
If we could put telescopes on the moon, we similarly wouldn't be limited by space and atmosphere like we are on Earth. Also, the moon isn't whipping around every 24 hours like the earth is so moon based telescopes could do a lot for allowing us to see better into the reaches of distance and the past.
If we established a base on the moon, it would be much much much easier to send scientific missions to the rest of the solar system. And I've already talked about why we study other bodies in the solar system in my first paragraph. The reason it's so hard to get into space from Earth is because of the crushing gravity. Escaping the moon's gravity is much easier. If we could launch from the moon, we could learn more about the solar system and thus it's creation much more easily.
And if you are interested in learning more about God's creation, well that is the entire universe. We are not studying these planets because we are interested in abandoning Earth, but so that we can learn more about the Earth, the Solar System that it exists in, the galaxy it exists in, and the universe that it exists in. Nothing exists separately from anything else and truly understanding and appreciating the whole of creation requires wanting to admire the beauty of the whole thing. We can't understand truly the beauty and complexity of the Earth without understanding how it formed and where it stands with respect to everything else. And if we only focus on understanding and appreciating the beauty of Earth, we are ignoring the vast heavens of creation, most of creation.
However, I think Bush just wanted to put NASA's money into moon and mars travel because he wanted to be seen as a visionary like Kennedy. A lot of very exciting and very important astronomical projects probing the edges of our understanding of our vision into universe, allowing us to see further and in new ways, have been put on hold because of President Bush's directive. In essense, science has been forced to bend to politics with scientists and their life-long projects at the mercy of President Bush's play for a second term at the presidency. He didn't even supply NASA with enough money to do what he asked. It was just a gesture he made a few weeks before he was up for re-election. Hopefully, when the administration changes, science will be allowed to resume it's course with scientists who know what's going on in science deciding the best course of scientific pursuit.
2007-01-17 04:04:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by venus19000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because when the next supervolcano caldera (such as Yellowstone) explodes, the only mamals that survive will be small ones that can burrow underground and hybernate for a year. Unless they're safely on the moon or pluto, that is.
2007-01-17 03:39:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree with that assumption. We want to see beauty in all of gods creation. Have you seen Pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope? They are some of the most Beautiful things I have ever seen. I once showed a picture of a nebula to a child, and asked them if they knew what that was. He said "Heaven".
2007-01-17 04:32:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by au197_0 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
To view the beautiful planet from a long distance.
2007-01-17 10:10:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by nataraj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because man has an unending curiosity for the unknown. And we need to look for another planet we could survive in since soon our earth might explode or something.
2007-01-17 03:38:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by twentyfour 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Lord also gave us minds to use, curiosity to satisfy, and the need and desire to explore all His creations, not just this one tiny place.
There are beauties in space and on other worlds that He created to be enjoyed and appreciated - if we don't try to find them then aren't we dishonouring His work?
2007-01-17 15:49:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋