which one?
2007-01-17 03:20:51 · 6 answers · asked by Chetos NFL Bowl Series Comisionr 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
if they had an union
2007-01-17 03:25:18 · update #1
correct answer was sean payton.look it up
2007-01-18 03:31:24 · update #2
NFL coaches would never go on strike because, unlike the players, they are not part of a union. It's only unions that go on strike.
2007-01-17 03:24:25 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Malaprop 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well Bellichick isn't part of the Union if I am not mistaken, so would he count? Seriously though why would the Coaches go on strike? The real question is if the COACHES go on strike will the PLAYERS cross the picket line and play despite them? If they will then the coaches come home really fast.
2007-01-17 11:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They all have seperate contracts, so they are not part of a "collective bargaining agreement".. However, if they DID form a union, and happened to strike, I doubt any would cross the line since there are only 32 teams and nobody would want to have that fact on their record/reputation for the rest of their career..
2007-01-17 11:25:11 · answer #3 · answered by Jersey Giant 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As the coaches are part of management, I believe this to be a moot question; if they went on strike, their jobs would not be there when they ended their strike, the owners would replace them all.
2007-01-17 11:24:00 · answer #4 · answered by mrjomorisin 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think people would still watch football with replacement coaches
but not with replacement players
2007-01-17 11:48:35 · answer #5 · answered by Adam P 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
nothing to do with your question but i love you icon.... GO STEELERS!!
2007-01-17 11:25:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋