English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-17 03:06:50 · 21 answers · asked by A Guy in Manhattan, NY 1 in Politics & Government Elections

21 answers

I would rather go thru HELL with gasoline soaked underwear, than to vote for the extreme liberal,that will ban hunting, fishing, because fishing is cruel to the fish,Ban Beef, because it's cruel to cows,ban milk, because it's cruel to cows,wives will no longer have to use their husbands last name, as she did before Billy boy got into politics and it was politically correct to use his last name,about the only good thing she may do is repeal the marijuana law and make it legal to smoke it, which her and Billy Boy do all the time or should i say used to do all the time, of course we need to be high , if she's president anyway

2007-01-20 11:10:47 · answer #1 · answered by DukeofDixie 7 · 0 0

Although I think she has the potential to be a good President based on the international respect she garnered as First Lady, I doubt if she would win the election. In order to have a majority substantial enough to sway the electoral college, she would have to win over the votes of the moderate "swing" voters. Too many of those would not vote for her because she was the First Lady to President Bill Clinton, because she is quite liberal despite any moderate viewpoints presented in her Senatorial campaign, and, sadly, because she is a woman. If she chooses a good running mate or if the Republican candidate is less appealing, it could compensate for these issues and we could see her elected. As there are several other good Democratic candidates, such as Edwards, thinking about running, it should be interesting to see how Senator Clinton's presence influences the race.

2007-01-17 12:10:48 · answer #2 · answered by AmyU 2 · 0 1

I think she is a strong, intelligent woman, that is not afraid to stand up for what she believes in. However she has a problem with the repuglican hate machine with their daily attacks on her. They go so far as to get into her private life just like they did with her husband. She may not be a viable candidate because of it. But I think she would make an excellent leader of the free world. She certainly would have an excellent adviser in her husband. The last legally elected president and also the best at running the business of the country in over 40 years.

2007-01-17 11:20:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

My main problem with Hillary is that all of her political positions before she became a senator were leftest extremist views. In order to win in New York and set the stage for a potential presidential run she shifted to the middle to appear as a moderate.
I have a problem with people who will switch positions at the drop of a hat just to win elections. That tells me that they have no real position on anything. They just do what their advisers tell them to. Tell me what you stand for and stick to your principles!

I am also tired of people saying George Bush is a moron, he graduated from Yale and had better grades in college than Bill Clinton. It is ok to disagree with someones politics and ideas but just because they don't think exactly like you do doesn't make them a moron!

2007-01-17 11:18:14 · answer #4 · answered by crazyhorse19682003 3 · 1 2

I think it would be great but I doubt it will happen. As an average American male I see it as win-win. If she gets elected to office she might do a great job and we all benefit. Worse case scenario she makes a mess off things but then I would have a great response to people who insist a woman would do a better job! Plus, would it be fun to have a first gentleman? I could go for that job.

2007-01-17 11:19:08 · answer #5 · answered by sunbird_55405 2 · 2 0

She would be a very good president, given her ability, Senate experience, and connections. Don't discount the latter point: an effective President must be able to attract quality people to work for him/her. She can call on an impressive list of people to work in her Administration. That said, however, she attracts an awful lot of unfair abuse in this country, particularly in the Red states. I doubt she can win a general election, despite having voted to authorize the War.

2007-01-17 11:18:26 · answer #6 · answered by squashman 2 · 2 2

Well I am a democrate but I do not like the idea of Hillary for president.

2007-01-17 11:15:25 · answer #7 · answered by Misfit_101 3 · 1 1

NEVER happen. President's have and will always be men. IF (that's a big if) she were to become President, she'd probably be as worthless as her hubby was when he was President. Then again, when he was President, wasn't she pretty much running the show???

2007-01-17 11:15:55 · answer #8 · answered by Jen G 3 · 1 1

I don't trust her and I don't like her. She has a shrill voice and is prone to pander. She reminds me of every ex girlfriend I dumped for being bitchy so no I don't like her at all. I do not think she could handle the job. Can you name a single thing she has done since being elected by the gullible people of New York who are apparently more enamored with the idea of her than what she can do or what she has done. OOOOHHHHHHH yeah she has done something she got reelected. Does that count as an accomplishment?

2007-01-17 11:19:24 · answer #9 · answered by crawler 4 · 0 3

Need to get a woman as President (she had enough exp with Bill)
she would at least be an improvement on Bush.

2007-01-17 11:16:32 · answer #10 · answered by riverdanceboi 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers