The reason no Chel$ki is they have clearly paid over odds for alot of players so Shev, Dog and SWP are over £70m aready but I do not think they are worth it.
2007-01-17 03:05:47 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
I'd say player for player we have a younger and equally as good team as UTD so think we would be worth more also as we have the best player in the prem in Henry got to be worth Bucks
2007-01-17 03:11:33 · update #1
Come get some Lucifer u bell end
2007-01-17 03:13:13 · update #2
Lehman £1,000,000
Eboue £5,000,000
Gallas £12,000,000
Toure £12,000,000
Clichy £5,000,000
Fabregas £20,000,000
Rosicky £10,000,000
Hleb £8,000,000
Gilberto £7,000,000
Henry £20,000,000
Van Persie £13,000,000
Total £113,000,000
Van der sar £1,000,000
Neville £4,000,000
Ferdinand £16,000,000
Vidic £5,000,000
Evra £4,000,000
Ronaldo £22,000,000
Carrick £7,000,000
Giggs £4,000,000
Scholes £4,000,000
Rooney £25,000,000
Larsson £2,000,000
Total £94,000,000
so all you smelly mancs can do 1 ps i wont bother with Liverpool because they are really good (6-3)
jules t - transfer fees dont always reflect the value and if you think that carrick is worth that then YOU are the mug.
2007-01-17 03:33:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whilst not performing great in the league, don't discount my Spurs as a valuable squad. With players like Lennon, Huddlestone, Keane, Dawson, Jenas Defoe, Robinson, Chimbonda, Berbatov, etc, our squad would be highly valued.
How much for Lennon if SWP went for ridiculous money to Chelsea?
2007-01-17 03:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by mickeyleon123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question was which squad is worth the most, not how much each club payed for the player. I admit that man u did pay £29m for Ferdinand but that isn't really his value now.
I would say Arsenal just edge it because of the likes of Fabregas, Henry, Rosicky & van persie as well of the emerging talent they have, while man u have giggs & scholes who i think are great players but due to there age there value would be lower.
2007-01-17 06:57:03 · answer #3 · answered by alankshort 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
United. Ronaldo is worth about half of Chelsea's team. Throw in Rooney, Van Der Sar, Giggs, and Saha. Ronaldo and Saha have about as many goals as much teams do.
2007-01-17 03:09:52 · answer #4 · answered by billnted 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Accrington Stanley
2007-01-17 03:08:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am not sure who it is but it deinantly isnt Arsenal because they have lots of youth players and buy quite a few cheap rising talents like Fabregas and Walcott and Henry (when they first bought him). I would guess Man U
2007-01-17 05:32:40 · answer #6 · answered by joeygooner 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
toure i think you had better do your sums again as ferdinand was sold to man utd for around 29m and carrick was sold for 18.6 m.
are these your valuations of these players?
im a yid so i just hope you are wrong and think man utd have the 2nd most expensive squad.
2007-01-17 05:02:25 · answer #7 · answered by jules t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man united.
2007-01-17 04:35:42 · answer #8 · answered by harry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man utd
2007-01-17 03:52:53 · answer #9 · answered by richard_beckham2001 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Manchester United without a doubt, followed by Arsenal and their great kids and Liverpool.
2007-01-17 03:09:43 · answer #10 · answered by NM 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋