If Hillary Clinton ran for president, Oprah would run, too.
Personally, I would vote for Oprah.
There's something weird about Mrs. Clinton.
2007-01-17 02:12:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jacques 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
What trips me out about Hillary, is that the same people that deride Bush for being devisive or polarizing are fanatical about Hillary for President. She may possibly be the most polarizing figure on the radar for '08. It appears as if there will be some good Democratic candidates for '08 (aside from Kerry, Edwards, or Clinton.) I won't be voting Democrat, because I believe that a vote for the Democratic Party is a vote for Socialism. I probably won't be voting Republican, either; I've been voting for the Constitution Party whenever possible.
2007-01-17 02:32:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by michaelh1268 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No - not only would I vote for someone else I would personally oppose her. Read the communist manifesto and explain the difference between her and a Communist. The only distinction is the employment of fancy word games.
Remember Slick Willy in the Oral Orifice? "I did not have sexual relations with that women." Come on now, what a bunch of liars.
I used to be a Demonrat that has since evolved into a Christian Libertarian/Republican. Congressman Ron Paul is the only potential candidate that I'm aware of that absolutely supports the United States Constitution and he has a track record of doing so. Why would anyone support anyone who opposes the US Constitution?
2007-01-17 02:17:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Too early to say. But if Mike Huckabee or Obama decides to run too, it could be very interesting. There are some things I like about all 3 but I'll have to see where the candidates stand. Although I call myself a republican, I'm not opposed to voting democrat. I vote with knowledge, not emotions.
2007-01-17 02:19:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton= there is no way on God's green earth that I would vote for her
2007-01-17 02:18:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by cowboybronco01 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes I would, depending on who else is running, in short I think she is a viable candidate. She is a strong, intelligent woman that is not afraid to stand up to what is right, she would have an excellent adviser in her husband, the last legally elected president and also the most effective at the business of running the country in over 40 years.
2007-01-17 02:16:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Not at all, i will be voting for a fiscal conservative. If they do not put up a viable candidate, I will look at the Libertarian candidate. If I don't think they stand where I do on issues, I will not be voting. I am not going to vote for the lesser of the evils!
2007-01-17 02:13:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It depends on who she's running against.
If the Republicans put up Ron Paul (highly unlikely) or Chuck Hagel, or maybe John McCain or Mitt Romney, I'd probably vote for them.
If the Republicans put up Sam Brownback or Tom Tancredo (both of which are right-wing nuts) or Rudy Giuliani (who everybody loves, despite him being a very scary and power-hungry person) ... I might vote for her.
2007-01-17 02:17:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
♥ Well I'm not old enough to vote for her but I asked my mom and dad. They said they wouldn't vote for her because they think she wouldn't be a good president and she is in it for the wrong reasons
2007-01-17 02:13:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Two words.... HELL NO!!!
Women have a tendency to be too liberal. And yes, I am a woman. I guess if you are super liberal, then you would like her as a president. For a woman to be preseident she has to have that something special. The ability to enforce without coming off as b i t c h y. I dunno, something about HER in particular rubs me the wrong way. If Condi Rice ran, then I'd vote for her in a heartbeat.
2007-01-17 02:18:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋