2007-01-16 23:41:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
NO!
Bush is a boy scout compared to Hitler. That is not to say Bush is a great guy. I support intelligent criticism of our president, but comparing him to Hitler is not intelligent!
By comparing ANYTHING currently happening in the USA to the atrocities of Nazi Germany is to undermine the Hell of the concentrations camps, gas chambers and mass graves!
Even if Abu Ghraib was part of Bush's plan, the cruelty there paled in comparison to Auschwitz!
Stick to facts. By making such ridiculous comparisons, you lose an opportunity to share REAL, VALID complaints against Bush.
2007-01-17 06:05:03 · answer #1 · answered by Smart Kat 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
President Bush nor the republican party has anything what so ever to do with Adolf Hitler the mad man that killed the Jews. It is my opinion that if you look at the Muslims that killed 4000 innocent people in the World Trade Center attack then you can certainly find the Hitlers of this world. I have a choice to vote as I please, and it will not be republican but that has nothing to do with murder. Our government sends out billions of dollars to help others, and some of them are Muslims that hate us. The money that is spent on these programs come from the wages earned by the American people. Most of us do not have the time for political affairs because we work many hours for everything we get. One third of our pay goes to the government before we see a dime of it. We, the American people, work in order to help others that hate us. How stupid is that? It is easy to criticise Americans if you do not know how much we do, and who is paying for it. Watching the news seeing some Muslims burning our flag, and chanting, "death to Americans" makes me sick. I personally think that we should leave the ridiculous politics of third world countries alone. If they do not want us there let us leave them to kill each other. If Islam calls for the life of innocents then it is a bad religion. Let us deny them the right to come here, and the money to get here. Let them educate themselves, abuse their women, and continue to wipe their butts with a rock. George Bush and the American Repulican pary are not the culprit here. Hitler has been reborn, but only in the name of Islam. Muslims hate Americans as Hitler hated the Jews. Osama is the Hitler that hids, and slithers in the name of Mohammad, and his mother is a pig.
2007-01-17 14:41:23 · answer #2 · answered by sparkle 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Republican supporters have that mentality more than the present U.S. government. They don't care what the ethnic background is of those they're killing. Their driving force is greed. Not racism. The fact that Iraqis are Muslim just makes the effort easier to justify to their base, that's all.
2007-01-17 07:58:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. As far as confronting the Muslims somebody should. They already have a constitution for England when they take over. They are dangerous because they have no value for women or human life. They are like communists, but much worse. And they spread their religion by the sword, just like the Pope said. Not all are like that, but in general they have a violent religious belief system. If you don't believe me read the Quaran, try to find the word "love" or "peace" in it.
2007-01-17 07:54:10 · answer #4 · answered by Kyle S 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
what's funny about that question is that while it tries to read some devious motive that isn't there, it never mentions that terrorists wish to destroy the jewish race. and there's no speculation there; on many occasions religious and political leaders have proclaimed a desire to wipe out isreal and all jews. they've also denied the holocaust and recently had a conference to attempt to do so.
2007-01-17 08:29:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
how can you ask such question when he is still in power. however In future, People will study and surprise that there was no one to stop him. Like we think there was no one to stop Hitler.
2007-01-17 07:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by Moonboy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only similarity between them comes in terms of ruthlessness and atrocities. Seems like Bush's is more pronounced since he has formed partnership with the parasite israel.
Other than that, Hitler was a whole lot more intelligent and had a better grasp of his mother/father tongue than Bush.
2007-01-17 07:49:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
This question is so lame and ridiculous that the only reason I'm posting a reply at all is to get the points.
2007-01-17 07:52:19 · answer #8 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Your question is not a logical one,terrorists are the target and will be for some time.
Religion or nationality has nothing to do with it!
2007-01-17 07:51:15 · answer #9 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush is worse than Hitler.
Why?
Because Bush came from a privileged background, and attended an Ivy League college.
Hitler never had those advantages. He was a bum, who spent time in the slammer.
2007-01-17 08:10:44 · answer #10 · answered by Panama Jack 4 · 2⤊ 6⤋