I live in Indiana. Like many states, it seems to me that Indiana defines "gambling" in terms of games of chance, but not in contests of skill or ability. I have noticed that local pubs often have pool or dart tournaments where contestants pay to enter and can win the pot. Am I correct in concluding that these tournaments are allowed in these games because they are games of skill? So, if this is allowed on a tournament level, then it should be allowed for an individual contest as well, correct?
2007-01-16
23:20:17
·
6 answers
·
asked by
g-man
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I understand that it would be difficult to enforce, but in a public place, one could be overseen exchanging money, etc. That was not really my point.
My point has to do with the distinction between games of chance, such as poker, and games of skill, such as pool. I began to look into it after a guy in the UK tried to defend an illegal gambling charge by saying it was a game of skill and was therefore not "gambling". I came to find that in my own state, there was a distinction between games of chance and contests of skill.
Even in my example of the local pubs in my area, they do offer poker tournaments, but there is no entry fee - so this is technically not gambling because you are not risking anything. It is done just to promote the bar and get more customers. But that same bar has weekly pool tournaments where you pay a fee to enter. But pool is a game of skill.
The tournament is run by some dude. I don't think he has any regulatory authority!
2007-01-17
00:07:15 ·
update #1