India is the largest democracy of the world, it is one of the most fast developing nations of Asia (both economically and culturally) and India is one country which participates in all most all UN peace keeping operations (Sri Lanka, many African countries etc). And there are many more reasons that i may not have thought of and you have. SO THINK.....
2007-01-16 22:35:38 · 9 answers · asked by katyani c 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
INTERNATIONAL POLITICS IS KEEPING US AWAY FROM THIS SEAT OTHERWISE WE DESERVE THIS SEAT FROM LONG TIME.
2007-01-20 00:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely,India must be selected in the UN security council as a permanent member because it is the first non-violent country and also it has helped many countries by sending its army to the United Nations to held a helping hand for others to develop.
2007-01-17 02:31:42 · answer #2 · answered by anuhya sai 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely. India deserves it on many accounts:
Nowhere in the history one can find that India has attacked other country for its personal gain
Whatever India thinks and plans, it always excecuted its plans, policies in the global context only
Whatever India gained anything through its efforts is always ready to share with rest of the universe, keeping in mind only the welfare of mankind
Its religious tolerance was and is always only on humnitarian considerations, but not for selfish deeds
If we consider on any grounds like, Human resource, technological, advancements, economical prowess, active involvement in any problems of the globe, throughout the history adherence to its values and principles, providing world standard education & medical assistance to anyone from any country.
These should be recognised and honoured by selecting as a permanent member to UN security council
2007-01-17 00:10:10 · answer #3 · answered by krishnachandra 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council (Britain, China, UK, US, and France) are the victors from WWII. Many other strong Western democracies are not permanent members -- (No Germany, Italy, Spain, etc) nor even larger economic powers. Unless the UN itself is scrapped and/or completely remade with a new charter, no one is going to add anyone as a permanent member.
2007-01-17 01:43:19 · answer #4 · answered by Perdendosi 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
interior the present situations that's somewhat rather no longer likely that India will take care of an eternal u.s. seat a minimum of for the subsequent 10 to fifteen years.The formalities in this regard would be an prolonged drawn out affair and isn't any longer executed everywhere for a decade a minimum of,by using which era the completed equation would substitute and native balances may well be altered notably.So the respond on your poser is "would and then returned will possibly no longer". Have an Unambiguous Day.
2017-01-01 03:29:23 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They won't be a part of it anytime soon, as they refuse to accept the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. The 5 permament members of the security council are the only ones authorized to hold nuclear weapons, therefore India is technically going against the security council.
2007-01-16 22:41:38 · answer #6 · answered by crazydavythe1st 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why can't India create one?. I think the time has come that we stopped looking for any approvals or recognition from others. We have to forget the colonial subservient mentality and be a leader.
2007-01-17 02:10:40 · answer #7 · answered by indiananytime 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. we are trying to still date because of Americanise and britans policy we are not regonised
2007-01-16 22:44:11 · answer #8 · answered by narayanaswamy r THAMBU 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no it can't even protect itself how should i be security councel
2007-01-16 22:40:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋