2007-01-16 18:40:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It sounds like you are referring to the Scott/Lacy Peterson trial.
Only if it is after the Trial and Sentancing is over; at that point, it becomes public information. America is founded on free speech and after the verdict has been rendered and sentance determined, then it is not only legal, but ethical for the jury to reveal their deliberations in public after the fact and how the arrived at their decision.
2007-01-16 19:57:51 · answer #1 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes its ethical to reveal, but whose listening to that garb anyway
2007-01-17 02:44:38 · answer #2 · answered by lance 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and no... participation is public in nature, but participants' safety (privacy etc.) should be a real not just ethical concern...
2007-01-17 02:47:01 · answer #3 · answered by each may believe differently 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but it's over the top.
2007-01-17 02:43:09 · answer #4 · answered by lindakflowers 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell yeah! Why should that pathetic fool have any rights? The man killed his pregnant wife!
2007-01-17 02:43:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anthony R 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-01-17 02:42:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i may be wrong, but as long as THEY consent to it I believe its ethical for them to divuldge it,
2007-01-17 02:42:55 · answer #7 · answered by daughters_a_wookie 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋