I was soooo disappointed by the ending, not to mention unable to sleep. If it doesn't have a happy ending, or at least a death with meaning at the ending, what's the point? That's 2 hours of my life I'll never get back!
2007-01-16 18:05:30 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I agree with you too. What a screw job he got in that movie. If I got a letter from my ex-fiance asking for help I'd rip it up or burn & forget about the whole thing. Wouldn't you? The origonal is alot bettter.
2007-01-17 01:59:52 · answer #1 · answered by rje316 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I absolutely agree with you. The original Wickerman film was considerably better. And although you will never get those 2 hours of your life back, take comfort in the fact that the whole world (well, at least everybody who watched the film) is feeling your pain.
2007-01-16 18:15:07 · answer #2 · answered by Holly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched it and thought the two substantial actors have been very sturdy. Wilfred Bramble got here upon as lonely and not with the flexibility to come again to words along with his gender whilst Harry H Corbett got here upon as slightly a great head. do not comprehend if the two have been authentic, however the programme exchange into very thrilling. It exchange into additionally unhappy that they could not get to any extent further paintings different than for Steptoe and Son.
2016-12-16 06:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by woolf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. I should have just left the movie theater and not wasted 2 hours of my life.
2007-01-16 18:08:55 · answer #4 · answered by matty.. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I buddy I went to school with, worked on the film. He is very embarrassed to even say he worked on the film.
2007-01-16 18:08:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That movie was Awfully Horrendous and should be stricken from view. Blahhh....Awful
2007-01-16 18:11:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree~ They should have paid me to watch it
2007-01-16 18:09:22 · answer #7 · answered by nobodyuknow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋