English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

not push so hard to get them?

I think its a counter measure for security reasons to ensure Israel doesnt use theirs.

2007-01-16 18:02:32 · 4 answers · asked by Mr. I Don't Care 1 in Politics & Government Politics

israeli leaders have spewed the same anti west filth that irans leader has. yet we choose to ignore the threat of israel as well. Oh well The USA's Loyalty only goes to the highest bidder.

If Iran paid as much as Israel to get our affection we would be invading Israel right now

2007-01-16 18:04:07 · update #1

4 answers

What threat of Israel? your full of s**t, Israel doesnt pose any kind of threat. They have never said that they would use their nukes on any other country. IRAN HAS. Ahmadeni -freak has said openly that he will use nuclear bombs on Israel when he gets them. YOU ARE FULL OF S**T my ignorant friend


And What supposed "anti-west filth" from israel are you talking about?

oo look!! you have a partner in insanity!! "Longhaired Freaky Person" meet "Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam" Now you both can spew your incorrect claims of Israel and America together...in a perfect harmony of BULLS**T

2007-01-16 18:08:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You think Israel is anti-West? Boy have you got it worong!!

Israel's leaders are acting against the best interests of Israel only because the West is requesting (and perhaps forcing) them to do so.

Iran is a terrorist state that has proclaimed that it wishes to destroy Israel. Nuclear weapons would give them the opportunity to do so, heaven forfend.

If Israel does indeed have a nuclear capability, it will use it only as a last resort, after a first strike by some other power.

Iran is the biggest threat to the West today, and their military capability must be curbed by the West.

In addition, individual terrorists must be eliminated--if necessary by engaging them and killing them.

There can be no rational argument against this two-pronged approach.

2007-01-17 11:12:52 · answer #2 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 1 1

Well if Israel didn't had nukes and if US wouldn't keep arming the countries around Iran,then yes,maybe they wouldn't push so hard to get them.They saw what happened to Iraq,where there were no nuclear weapons and they saw very clear how North Korea wasn't attack because they have nuclear weapons and they made sure that everyone knew about it...So Iran knows that as long as they would have nukes no one would dare attacking them...

2007-01-17 14:54:44 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0 0

Yes. The UN has resolved to have a nuclear-free Middle East, and I do not understand why Israel is allowed to flaunt this while it has been used to persecute Iraq and Iran.

2007-01-17 02:13:24 · answer #4 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers