Is gay love more physically embedded? Men are hunters, not nurturers, by nature . Is gay love more spiritual?

Answer 1

I think many who are against homosexuality will say it is because they can't handle the concept of two of the same gender loving each other in an emotional sense.

As a female, I can only speculate and extrapolate from the gay male couples I personally know. I know they have deep emotional bonds with their partners. They're relationships are indeed nurturing in nature.

Answer 2

I'm going to give you a non-politically correct reply. I think your instincts are pretty much right.

Gay sex tends to be more about the erotica part of actually being with somebody and connecting with another person then just the pleasure an orgasm produces although raw animal gay lust still exists don't get me wrong.

This is why homophobic men who have homosexual desires feel conflicted as hell. What they feel is more potent to them then what is supposed to be 'natural'- and they've been brainwashed by religion/society to think that their desires are somehow weaker even though the opposite is true. So they **** a lot of women and even become misogynists, because they are insecure in their own masculinity.

But looking in mammalian species, it's incredible how common homosexuality exists. Heterosexuality is kinda just a fad for when females are in heat a lot of the time, and it's the homosexuality that is dominant and keeps everyone alive by encouraging cooperation between males. In humans, although it certainly isn't THAT simple, I predict that homosexuality is natural for those same reasons. People who think homosexuality has 'no point' are simply uneducated.

There are many things animals do that people don't interpret as 'homosexual' but I'd have to disagree. They turn it as a dominance thing. Self-loathing human gays do this as well. (I just let the guy suck my dick because it was a power thing) Somehow, the thought they actually connected spiritual with a man is terrifying to them. Guys on the downlow do this, they convince themselves they're not really gay as long as they inhibit certain behaviors, but in turn they just inhibit their own soul and what it wants to experience.

Really we need to stop all this bullshit psychoanalysis of gays and sexual identity because it goes nowhere. We just like who we like, and our body craves sex with that person in order to feel whole.

As far as men are hunters, not nurturers - things are never that black and white. You also have to take into consideration that this was simple biology and not necessarily something all men wanted or craved to do. (do you think a poor lion wants to be aggressive and feast, no- it does so because it must, in order to survive- they can usually be quite passive and affectionate, to give one example)

I'm better at fighting than most females just because I have the body for it, but underneath I'd rather have somebody else do it. I'm a lover not a fighter what can I say. I want to take care of a man. If this makes me seem 'feminine' to a gay man then they have their own issues they need to work out. It's the year 2007. We're not hunting anything besides our own inner psychosis. Men can be sensitive and girls can kick ***. Didn't Buffy teach us anything!

Sorry that this is so long but yeah. I might have more later.

Answer 3

i'm gay married 20 years and our relationship is nurturing.

Answer 4

Depends on where the lesbians feature into this question.

Answer 5

it islust of flesh not considered love.

Answer 6

well.. that depends. i mean, love's just love, why do you hafta specify?

Answer 7

probably not.