your point of view on the war in iraq?

Question

someone said this "lets take whatever resources that are necessary for us and the world...and **** the innocent cause even most them don't like us...just drop nuclear bomb on there asses...the wars done rigth there" what do you think about what they said?

Answer 1

Well, I grew up in a Patriotic way to protect my homeland, love the citizens, and protect and love my constitution...
I think that people that talk that way are extremely selfish and not in check of their feelings.That is dangerous and would devastate our whole world. We all share the same air space, and nuclear fall out floats....I think that, we have a tyrannical government and elitists behind him, that the cia ought to take out of office. They violate our constitutional rights daily

Answer 2

let us establish a few points. the current president of the "united states" will account for his actions that have (directly or indirectly) caused tens of thousands of casualties and already a full blown civil war. No one is above judgement.
that being said let us take take a quick look at these two scenarios. put aside all biases and really assess which is the greater of the evils or the lesser of the goods.
1. the "tyrant sadam hussein is IN POWER and the streets of Iraq are in calm
2. the "peacemaker bush is IN POWER and there is turmoil, car bombings, bloodbaths, moms and sisters being raped.
honestly think about it
WHAT can possibly justify the deaths of thousands of innocent people. "saddam hussein the dictator is ousted" and held to account?
what kind of a man was he? at last check iraq was doing well and going about their affairs under his rule. then they will say what about the countless people he massacred? a terrible atrocity indeed but I ask in return when did this take place? what has been the state of iraq for the last 10 years prior to the war in 03?
So in essense the justification (or rather the commander in chief's justification) for the war in iraq was and still is the ouster of hussein. one single man . ONE single man is so cruel and twisted in nature, that his demise in itself justifies the killings of thousands of civilians????
one single man
One man can only detract from and account for another.
you simply CANNOT value one persons life at the exchange rate of 2 others or in this case 50,000+ others.
this is really a sad tragedy and alone gives credence to the fact that there is the Ultimate Judge and Every person will undergo judgement.

Answer 3

a million. US-Iran kinfolk contributors have not been the suitable for the clarification that we staged a coup in 1953 and tried their suitable minister for attempting to nationalize the oil industry purely via actuality Britain replaced into taking 80% of the earnings. That ended up backfiring, purely via actuality it led to the Islamic Revolution, yet it truly is even even with the undeniable fact that the resource of a few anti-Western resentment. 2. for sure, the Iranian government is extremely anti-Israel, so our chronic help of Israel is a great thorn of their section. 3. and ultimately, anybody's properly-cherished debate... Iran's nuclear aims. How have we helped Iran? thoroughly via twist of destiny. The action in Iraq, as somebody else observed, did help oust one between Iran's ultimate enemies. additionally, there is communicate now of arming Iraqi Shi'ites and Kurds, that can effectively wipe out the Sunni inhabitants. Iran, being a Shia u . s . a ., could thoroughly bypass alongside with this.

Answer 4

Iraq is the concern of the Iraqis--- This line should have been adopted from earlier rulers days prior to Saddam, to have their own destinies. No meaning in supplying chemical weapons and then shouting from roof top, that chemical weapons are being used on a section of the population namely shias, kurds. The talk of genocide hence is of no meaning. The country should have been left to fend for themselves, which did not have a civil war.
Even now, leave it to the locals for managing their country...oil or no oil, WMDs or no WMDs, Saddam or no Saddam. It is their concern. When outsiders enter, support one group, more no. of groups emerge to fight among themselves.
VR

Answer 5

I used to agree and say the very same thing. But now--if it's not there--it's going to be elsewhere. Not all people have ill feelings towards another countries people just because there is war--some people don't want it as much as others.
We dropped on Japan--in fact 2 of them and we're fighting another war. So, let's just face it--war has been around for hundreds of years--and it will be here for hundreds more--

Answer 6

There have been three thousand Americans killed in Iraq.
United Nations reported 34,452 CIVILIANS were slain last year, nearly three times more than the government reported. The U.N. figures showed that an average of 94 civilians died each day in sectarian bloodshed in 2006. We need to get out of there. Who wants to be the parent of the last young man or woman killed in Iraq?

Answer 7

It's not vietnam, but its the next worst war we've ever fought. After long long time everyone will wonder why in the hec US military was used to overthrow Saddam.

Answer 8

I don't agree with the reasons for going to war in Iraq.

We have made a mess & now me should do our best to clean it up.

Answer 9

What a horrible waste of human life

Answer 10

They are fat and never had a girl in thier lives

Thats why they are such angsty little dorks :D