At what point would you stop treating him as a messiah?
After no WMD's? (my personal cut-off point).........
2007-01-16 16:40:43 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
no i do not take orders from a dictator
2007-01-16 19:07:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
My cut off point was Iraq when 15 out of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia it seems like Bush wanted to protect his friends country from the American People and move the attention before people caught on.
2007-01-17 00:47:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
i dont trust the guy with a spoon, let alone to run the free world.
my cut off point was when we found out there werent any WMD's. ever since then its been once big snowball of wet brown crap smelling lies.
the country is in the worst condition its been in as long as i can recall.
if he told me to do pretty much anything, i'd probably ask him to write it down for me. i'm fairly certain he cant read or write, so i know i wouldnt need to do it.
2007-01-17 00:52:29 · answer #3 · answered by hellion210 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is the Commander in Chief, so yes, I would.
If he asked me to do something illegal or morally wrong, I would stop treating him as the President.
Jesus Christ is the Messiah.
2007-01-17 00:44:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please get a grip no body least of all me see him as a messiah... maybe the anti-Christ but not the messiah!
Yes ladies and gentleman let it be known i am a republican not all republicans look up to George as a matter of point some of us even despise him...like me!
But i despise liberalism / socialism / Communism even more... sorry
2007-01-17 00:49:55 · answer #5 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who thinks of him as a messiah??? I've heard anti-christ associated with his name but not messiah. Simple question: would you jump off a bridge if I told you too??
2007-01-17 00:55:17 · answer #6 · answered by kingskid14512 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very delusional approach in your question: 1) being the Commander in Chief it is his orders we follow: 2) he is not any messiah, just a man in POWER.
2007-01-17 00:47:40 · answer #7 · answered by onAhhroll 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is not a messiah he is a an illuminati anti-christian aka satans joker he has the world all fooled he will soon start the begining of world war three.
at this point in time you should not take a word he sya serious unless you have proff.
2007-01-17 02:29:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If the President tells me, yes I would. But he is not the Messiah, not he claims to be one. Only JesusChrist is the true Messiah. . .
2007-01-17 00:44:13 · answer #9 · answered by ginger13 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one treats him like the Messiah. Iraq at very least used to have weapons of mass destruction and he used them on his own people.
BTW a serin gas loaded bomb exploded in Iraq in 2004, it was a very small one but it is evidence that they still had some chemicals that count as WMD's
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4997808...
Saddam was suspected of murdering up to ONE MILLION of his own PEOPLE including babies
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_...
In 1980 he invaded Iran to start a war officially it lasted eight years but the hostilities lasted ten., during the war 100,000 Iranians fell victim of Iraq's Chemical weapons otherwise known as WMDs. So we know he had WMD's in the 1980's
http://www.answers.com/topic/iran-iraq-w...
In 1990 He invaded Kuwait , but was beaten back by a 32 nation
coalition. As part of the aftermath of the war he was ordered to get rid of all his WMD's and submit to inspections, that he continually resisted. If he had nothing to hide he should have let the inspectors do what they were supposed to do BEFORE we got tired of his ten years of inspection evasions.
http://www.answers.com/topic/gulf-war...
If you are not glad that the SOB was brought to justice
by his own people. I don't want to know you. If you are glad you have President Bush to thank for that. I just wish his dad had the same determination as his son, hundreds of thousand of lives would have been saved.
It is not the presidents fault that the civil war started. How was he to know how many blood thirsty people live in the middle east?
He was lead to believe that Islamic extremist were few and far between, how was he to know that thousands of them lived in Iraq.
His main mistake was trusting that the Iraqis would be as easy to take down as they were during the first Gulf War.
I by no means think that the president is perfect, but he is certainly better then Kerry who admitted in front of Congress that
he had knowledge that all soldiers would be able to make a similar statement to the one he was about to make. That statement included these words.
" had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, tape wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country. "http://www.nationalreview.com/document/k...
If he had that kind of knowledge he must have either participated in these war crimes or stood by and watched while others did it.
Or he is a BIG LIAR, which I am more inclined to believe.
Either way he is scum. And deserved the Oval office allot less then President Bush does.
2007-01-17 01:50:48 · answer #10 · answered by Mad Maxine 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you mean the 500 WMDs our military said they found in Iraq
2007-01-17 04:30:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋