I've noticed too, that Angelina's arms seem awful thin and her legs....but then, she always has seemed to have very skinny arms & legs, except when she was pumped up for the Lara Croft movies. She looked awesome then! She still is the most beautiful woman out there to me, except for Cher!! I don't think Angie has had anything done to her breasts, they've always been large and like someone else said, having had a baby, well, they would be bigger now. She's probably run down from trying to care for 2 really young children, even with Brad's help, it has to be hard. Probably don't eat enough or sleep enough.
2007-01-16 18:00:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Blue J 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Angelina has always been very slim and slightly muscular. But lately I have noticed her frame slimming down. Her head was bigger than her body at the Golden Globe Awards. I don't think her boobs are fake though. After all, she did give birth not too long ago so it is only natural for her boobs to be larger than their natural size.
2007-01-16 16:36:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by GlitzNGlam 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
enable's see, beginning by the actuality that she kissed her very own brother in public is already not the main reassuring element. and those eyes... evil as sinl! and are available on-- I actual have finished(er) lips and can desire to try this strange 'pucker up' any day (and not utilising a strange crack line down the midsection of my lips, by ways)! So, i assume I purely choose some million and then i might properly be renowned? Wow. and what's along with her being "stylish"? She has tatoos, for goodness' sake! have confidence me, i don't have something against tatoos as long as that's not too lots and not a cranium or notwithstanding, yet please... has what the media calls 'splendor' truly stooped that low? unhappy. in my view, she has strange ft, undesirable epidermis, too skinny hair/physique, creepy eyes, undesirable mouth, jaw-- and enable's not communicate mentality! 0 understanding in there, human beings. So, sorry, i know i don't have anymore mind-blowing to choose her this way than she does to disguise herself at the back of makeup and charity donations, yet particularly: some human beings choose a fact verify right here!! Honesty can equivalent to being critic, in spite of each and every thing. Oh, and final element: Beyoncé is actual not one (wo)guy extra advantageous to learn Mrs. *Pas* Jolie with! Sorry, no offence, my opinion...
2016-10-07 06:50:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do think she looked too thin at the Golden Globes (but a lot of the stars did). I thought her dress was beautiful, but her bones and tattoos looked horrible.
2007-01-17 01:45:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by khy8w2004 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-01-16 16:25:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, well she probably lost too much weight after the baby.. People do it all the time.. So promise me she will gain it back. Its not the first time I have seen it and I own a Weight Watchers!!
2007-01-16 16:24:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is getting WAY too skinny which isn't a very good thing. I'm totally with you on this one. She used to be prettier when she had a bit more weight on.
2007-01-16 16:36:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pre lives on 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe she wouldn't be so skinny if she took that black magic spell off of Brad Pitt and quit breaking up marriages. It's called karma.
2007-01-16 19:27:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by neve_freak2001 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree..used to look great, but lately her arms are creepy skinny
2007-01-16 16:23:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by kathy n 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems to me like she is always been the same, i really don't see that much difference ( physically), but she had a baby so is normal if her boobs got bigger.
2007-01-16 16:20:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by jayden 4
·
2⤊
1⤋