English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would we be better off?
or
would you want to revolution?

2007-01-16 15:20:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anthony M 4 in Politics & Government Politics

a revolution**

2007-01-16 15:24:46 · update #1

Your wrong nco, it will happen. It's just a matter of time.

2007-01-16 15:25:28 · update #2

11 answers

It would depend upon who is running the one world government, and the type of government it would be! There are good and bad systems. The kind of system the power elite want to put into place is only good for them, but a nightmare for the rest of us.

However, if we were a truly enlightened/spiritually evolved society a one world government would be possible that would be run by all the people, for all the people, and be good for, and to, each and every one of us!!!! This system is not exactly common knowledge yet, but the ideas are already known to quite a few of us!!!!

I can't attempt to describe them here, but if anyone is really interested, email me and I will tell you my own sources...which, by the way are not the only sources for these or similar ideas!!!

The power elite will not approve of these ideas, because they want to keep all the power and resources for themselves!!!

But, I believe, that these ideas are precisely the way the world should be run, and the kind of world I could ever be happy in!!!

I have to repeat, however, I do not approve of the kind of one world government that the power elite wants to put into place. It would be a nightmare, and if that version of a one world government comes to pass, I WILL want a revolution!!!!!

If anyone really believes that there is no danger of the nightmare version of the one world government actually coming to pass, they may live to regret it if they don't wake up!!!! The danger is very, very real!!!!

2007-01-16 15:41:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It don't matter much wether we have one or many government. The working man will always be the slave, he pays for everybody including the government, I think that is ground enough for a revolution. The poor don't have it so they don't pay,
The rich have it but there is enough loopholes, they get to keep it and the worker, pays the bill. I say TO ARMS, TO ARMS, time to change the system.

2007-01-16 15:27:34 · answer #2 · answered by P.A.M. 5 · 2 0

guy-made international is in common words a small component of the concern. if we stopped polluting the surroundings, it would want to have an excellent result after many years of unpolluted-up. yet enable's seem on the real project it truly is previous us to regulate. NASA has with-held their discovery that solar's temperature has more effective (undergo in ideas those huge image voltaic flares many years lower back? solid indicator). info: Ice caps on Mars are shrinking, and the surfaces of moons round Jupiter and Saturn that are in many cases frozen are literally melting. Al Gore is using his scare tactic to help in instituting a carbon tax. once a carbon tax turns right into a reality, that is going to provide enormous authorities a justifiable reason to proceed to rob the individuals of even more effective of their frustrating earned income. this can further enslave the individuals to artwork longer hours and develop into more effective somewhat managed (because we can all be too busy operating to do a lot else).

2016-10-15 08:24:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WE can't let that happen here. It would mean the end of life as we know it. We would be under the thumbs of criminally insane dictators.
WE had better revolt against the UN BEFORE it happens.

2007-01-16 15:35:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I would want a revolution.

2007-01-16 16:04:08 · answer #5 · answered by j 4 · 0 0

We wouldn't need a revolution b/c Canada would be the ruling party.

2007-01-16 15:28:29 · answer #6 · answered by xxtra chocolate 3 · 0 2

Read my post on the U. N.

If they can't get it done, what makes you think a single world government can?

2007-01-16 15:28:13 · answer #7 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1 0

Revolution. Period.

2007-01-16 15:24:17 · answer #8 · answered by no worries 4 · 1 0

The Yanks would not like to not have their own army so that they could invade and destroy other countries.

2007-01-16 15:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by BOLÍVAR Libertador de América 1 · 0 1

Better

2007-01-16 15:24:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers