English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-16 14:41:07 · 27 answers · asked by thank you come again 2 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

27 answers

Actually, . . .
in some states they still use the death sentence. . .

Personally, I think that we should not punish someone by doing the same thing ourselves. Two wrongs should not make a right.

2007-01-16 14:44:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

we ought to consistently hear to the human beings who've lost somebody in a terrorist outrage or homicide and so on. I even have study many heart breaking thoughts and heard the families of victims arguing the two cases. i could purely upload that Brady (the Moors murderer) is obviously suffering and could evaluate dying a blessed alleviation so conserving him alive in penal complex waiting to lament and beg for dying possibly a deterrent to three. additionally Bee Walker who's son Anthony exchange into murdered in Liverpool chosen forgiveness based upon her religious ideals. perhaps we could even take a leaf out of a few Islamic regulation right here? In some international locations whilst the dying penalty is exceeded down the family members of the sufferer can % to coach mercy and permit the murderer to stay (often includes the murderers family members making a cost of reimbursement) perhaps it is properly worth learning as a answer allowing the victims family members the purely spectacular say on wether a dying sentence is performed or not?

2016-10-31 07:56:40 · answer #2 · answered by gilbert 4 · 0 0

It makes me mad that people think it's cruel and unusual punishment to kill someone on death row by lethal injection or the electric chair or whatever. What about the poor victim or victims, they didn't die by cruel and unusual punishment? Little kids being raped and dismembered is that not cruel and unusal punishment, how about sick. The victims have no rights anymore, but the one on trial does. He or she gets to most likely live out their lives in the comfort of some prison. They get 3 meals a day, a place to sleep. Hell convicts in prison live better than our homeless people and then they complain about cruel and unusual punishment because prison life is so awful. Give me a break. I agree with some of the other answerers here...an eye for an eye. Maybe if our judical system wasn't so corrupt, it wouldn't be so easy for murderers to get away with murder.

2007-01-16 15:09:07 · answer #3 · answered by cs_mn 3 · 1 1

Hang is considered inhuman to human world that's why many country has rejected that kind of idea or banned them in executing a prisoner who convicted any murder crime. Yes, murderers may be inhuman and cold blooded but we shouldn't think or lower ourself to their level. They may be cold blooded when handling their victims but if we hang them, does that mean we're cold blooded like them too? we need to show them what mercy is and jail for life is already enough to punish them.

2007-01-16 14:49:28 · answer #4 · answered by GOTHIC_SANNIN 4 · 1 2

Cruel and unusual punishment in the US, I suppose. But I wonder, just how cruel and unusual are murders in the first place? I say an eye for an eye. You shoot someone, you die by a gun. You cut someone's throat, you get yours cut. Do that for a while and lot of this crud would stop.

2007-01-16 14:54:43 · answer #5 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 1 1

Hmm, eventhough some people have been cold blooded murders, they still are people with dignity. And hanging is kinda bruttal, not that im say any form of execution is pretty, but im just saying hanging someone is too painfu compared to other forms of execution

2007-01-16 14:46:51 · answer #6 · answered by ZobmiJ 2 · 1 2

I don't know, but something needs to be done. Obviously, justice is never really served as many murderers continue to get released from prison.

2007-01-16 14:44:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because this world is corrupt, if you take someones life in cold blood, you should lose your life as well, but the offender should always be given a chance to accept God, Jesus...

2007-01-16 14:44:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Sadly because of do-process and an extensively drawn out appeals process. I think we need to bring back good old hangings also but for pedophiles. And by the way, they wouldn't be hung by their necks.

2007-01-16 14:45:13 · answer #9 · answered by Lov'n IT! 7 · 3 1

Personally I think that the punishment should fit the crime. The murderer should suffer just as much as his/her victim !

2007-01-16 14:47:18 · answer #10 · answered by g_man 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers