Are you in favor of a new investigation of 9/11?

Question

Its a fact this Nation spent 45 Million dollars on Clinton's BJ
and 15 Million on Americas largest mass murder.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Catherine Austin Fitts – Assistant Secretary of Housing under George H.W. Bush. Former Managing Director and Member of the Board of Wall Street investment bank, Dillon, Read & Co

Audio Interview 9/9/04: Regarding 9/11 "The official story could not possibly have happened... It’s not possible. It’s not operationally feasible... The Commission was a whitewash." (About 45 minutes into the file.) http://157


Essay 3/22/04: "The first category of people who benefited were those who are guilty and complicit in designing, implementing and financing the 9-11 operation. On such a sophisticated and successful covert operation, the people responsible would have had budgets and financing and would have organized the operation to maximize their political and financial benefits." http://globalresearch.ca


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. http://www.911truth.org/article


Bio: http://www.solari.com/about/ca_fitts.html

Fred Burks – Former State Department Interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Dick Cheney and Al Gore, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright. 18-year State Department career.

Essay: "How is it possible that our military's highly touted missile detections systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense system of the U.S.? …

An even bigger question is why isn't our media asking these questions? Why isn't our military spending many millions of dollars to find out why military defense systems failed on 9/11? Why is it that the 9/11 commission budget was far less than the budget allotted to the Challenger Disaster or even the Monika Lewinsky affair?"http://www.wanttoknow.info/911star


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. http://www.911truth.org

Answer 1

Yes. I have been saying this for almost 2 months. They various alternative theories are not what matters as much as the fact this investigation has been a whitewash. The members even met in a special meeting after the report was finished to decide whether to request indictments from the Justice Department over what they saw was obvious perjury. In the end, they left the decision to the Inspectors' General of the various other Cabinet agencies involved. Nothing has happened since. And why should it? Every Cabinet office , including Justice is part of the Executive Branch of government.

I urge you to check out the list of names below. Note the resumes. Note that 8 of the 11 members of the original inquiry believe it was a sham. Also, you may notice there are several former members of the Bush Administration on the list. Then it's up to you to decide what to do next.

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

Answer 2

Most definitely. There are too many people with the kind of doubts about what happened that day that need answers, such as what hit the :Pentagon, how and why did Bldg 7 come down.,etc. There has been no report that has stirred so much controversy that cannot be allowed to continue. Not the Warren Report on JFK's murder, nothing comes close. If this could be answered, one way or the other, the health of our nation would greatly improve. Never in our history has the integrity of the office of the President been so called into question. It is not healthy and should been fixed now.

Answer 3

Back when Clinton was being investigated we had a budgetary surplus, we could afford to spend money on "luxury" investigations. Since we are obviously running an enormous deficit, we need to be a little more frugal on what we spend our money on. I would suggest we spend that fixing Iraq where more people are officially dying than on 9-11 instead of pouring that money into pointing fingers along partisan lines.

Answer 4

If we can get one co-cospirator with a decent reputation to admit under oath or suggest a cover-up through out the oncoming oversight hearings, then the Dems should pursue that lead to the end.

If W can torture a man into making admissions under duress that are totally false and start a war, the Dems should have no problem conducting an independent investigation.

Answer 5

I think that we need to know what was in those highly classified documents Sandy Berger stole from the archives.

If they *did* do another investigation and proved you wrong, would you be satisfied? That's my answer, too - no.

Please....find another hobby! Yoga is nice....

bkc - if you want any help with that money.....

Answer 6

Yes, I am very interested. Why doesn't every here that thinks there was a US connection send me $100. When I reach $45,000,000, I'll go out and tell you what I find.

Maybe Al Gore and I go ride on the same plane and save some of that carbon he's always worried about.

Answer 7

No, because terrorists under the guidance of Bin Laden committed the terror acts of 9/11.

Answer 8

No, there is no need for a new investigation. Bin Laden needs to be caught and killed, but other than that, theres nothing more to be found out. That silly conspiracy theory is just ridiculous and most people agree, lib or con, dem or rep

Answer 9

Investigation of what? How the towers fell? Done. Who did it? Done. Why with all the money we lavish on the CIA, FBI etc they were clueless? That we should do.

Answer 10

Yes, but not now. Maybe a new investigation will put some peoples' minds at ease. No, the govt did not attack itself so they could steal oil that it had no stolen.