I can see how we need an instant replay on the plays that are good, but they show an instant replay on EVERY SINGLE PLAY!! I don't need to see a bad play replayed 3 or 4 times. Has anyone else noticed this ?
2007-01-16 13:26:40 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
dude totally. i mean they have to show EVERY ANGLE of the play that was made. and so if peyton manning threw an interception then they definitely show that like 50 million times and act like no other QB has threw and int. i mean sometimes they show so much instant replay that they are late playing the actual game.
2007-01-16 13:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean the replay they show on TV? I actually like it. It's better than watching the huddle, I get to see things I didnt see the first time (like a WR run a nifty route, or something else nice,) and once every blue moon, the commentators have something interesting to say about the play that I wouldnt have picked up on.
2007-01-16 21:34:21 · answer #2 · answered by Bobby S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you do need to see that bad replay 4 times
2007-01-16 21:37:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Negatory. I'm with you. And another pet peeve with me is the arbitrary way in which the officials call 'grounding the ball' . They seldom call it, but always and only when I don't want them to do so. It should either be ok by rules or not ok for a qb to save his ass by getting rid of the ball.
2007-01-16 21:35:58 · answer #4 · answered by Beejee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No..but they have to do something to kill time waiting for the next play, and to drag out time to sell more advertising to pay everyone the outrageous money they feel they need.
2007-01-16 21:30:51 · answer #5 · answered by tawana54 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe to see if he was out of pocket to call him for grounding.
2007-01-16 21:31:25 · answer #6 · answered by RangerFan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they CAN, they DO. Gets tedious, though, doesn't it?
2007-01-16 21:34:58 · answer #7 · answered by katbyrd41 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋