Does it drive anyone else crazy that they bring in these big guys and make them completely unstoppable for months at a time? Sometimes I dont even want to watch the match anymore cause I pretty much know whats gonna happen...
2007-01-16 12:59:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
My Reply...ss...didn't know I couldn't reply to my own question to answer people.....
Not so much the Cena types but the giants....the great khali is really boring...the whole match or segment is about whoever he is facing just knocking him down...and you know he's only going to lose is on a ppv...at least with the mmm...lets say the master lock challenge you wanna see at least how far they get...but with the great khali they only get as far as the "brick wall" that they have the giants be.
Umaga wasn't that bad...at least when he got hit with a chair he teetered a little bit...but the great khali got hit with a chair and he didn't even flinch....ugh...at least they could make the giants/monsters better like they did with the Undertaker and Kane where they'd fall but they'd sit right back up...now that was GREAT!!
2007-01-16 13:30:51 · update #1
Vince has always had a thing for the big men.
2007-01-16 21:26:24 · answer #1 · answered by krkretz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well youre gonna have to put up with Umaga for a while.He's getting a big push especially now HHH is out for 6 months.Hes set to face Cena at the Rumble.He unstoppable cos the spike finisher is a wicked move.
The other big guys like Khali & Viscera & Snitsky are total dead losses.
2007-01-16 14:39:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes especially with slow, boring giants such as the Great Khali. He has like 3 moves in his offense and he sucks at cutting promos. Umaga is okay to me because he at least has some skill and he is pretty fast for a big guy.
2007-01-16 13:04:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah I totally know where your coming from. About 99% of every guy who's had that gimmick a) can't wrestle and b) i STRONGLY dislike. People like Umaga, Great Khali, Mark Henry, Test, Gene Snitsky, Tyson Tomko, etc. they're all just bad ideas. The only one that really pulled off that angle is Brock Lesnar but that's because, unlike every superstar up there listed, can ACTUALLY wrestle! It drives me crazy when not just WWE does this but also every other federation out there. I hate how predictable and how much of it goes on. BLEH!
2007-01-16 13:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by J 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Amen-
=Umaga got old quick(being that they only brought Jamal back as him so they could mock TNA and Samoa Joe)
=Khali was over before it started(they wanted a new "Giant Gonzales")
=The NTI's not failed us yet, keep with the Kennedys, Lashleys, etc.
=Giants are overrated
2007-01-16 13:06:04 · answer #5 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What really bothers me is that the answer for the Great Khali is the broken down immobile Hulk Hogan.
2007-01-16 13:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is boring to see one guy who isn't as good as other wrestlers but win like he is superman cough***CENA***cough
i mean they make great wretlers look like they suck when in fact if it wasn't predetermined just about every midcarder would be in the main event. even S2H is good but had to job to everyone even thou he probably could beat Batista or Cena.
2007-01-16 13:15:10 · answer #7 · answered by RaizenX 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
same in every sport u know whos gonna win i predicted this.
2007-01-19 09:59:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it makes thing boring when its to predictable
2007-01-17 06:33:28 · answer #9 · answered by liam0_m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
COUGH*CENA*COUGH
Yeah it's REALLY,VERY annoying....
2007-01-16 13:07:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋