English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Not including folk who are learning the language, do not speak the language well, have a limited education, etcetra. I am not picking on folk who are trying or on folk who are new here (legally or otherwise).

I'm speaking of people like our president (It's NU-CLE-AR, not NUKULAR). Yeah, I know that they have added a spelling like this to the dictionary so that the pres does not appear stupid. Yikes!

I'm speaking of folk with a basic education. It's 'Go ask you Mom' not 'Go axe your Moma'! It's not that difficult people!

Yeah, I know that one too! Totally ruined a very nice song a few years ago.

Not asking for perfection, just try! There are spell checkers available. I am not a racist. Heck, why do you think Obama stands such a very good chance to make it to the White House?

Sorry, ranting here ... I just came across a kid asking for help for homework but they made no attempt at 'trying' to use the language properly.

Am I the only one bothered by this? Trivial or what?

2007-01-16 12:18:49 · 7 answers · asked by Ol' Sasquatch 5 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

7 answers

Shoot no sugah, heck we Southerners would love it if y'all would try just a teeny bit harder to speak correctly. Y'all have a good night now 'ya hear.

2007-01-16 12:27:08 · answer #1 · answered by Only hell mama ever raised 6 · 1 0

This is a difficult question for me. I was raised by a father who would not tolerate the slightest grammatical error. And he required precise diction. The advantage that gave me was an tremendously advanced skill at reading and writing. Grammar was a natural language for me and I excelled at all language related tasks.

On the other hand I was nicknamed the little professor in grade school and tormented for my vocabulary throughout most of my young life through adolescence. Yes, I was a nerd. And, perhaps worse than that, a snob. I could render a negative judgment about a person's character and intelligence simply by listening to a couple of sentences.

Still, bad grammar and improper usage will probably always make the little hairs stand up on the back of my head. I just want to try not to judge the value of the person I'm speaking to by whether or not he shares a lexicon and phonetic map with me.

2007-01-16 13:08:25 · answer #2 · answered by Julie C 3 · 0 0

If you like words, and you like language, and you like playing with words, it's understandable that you'll be bothered when somebody misuses a word or has poor grammar.

It's not trivial unless you obsess over someone's grammar every second of every day.

2007-01-16 12:27:47 · answer #3 · answered by micky_baxter 2 · 1 0

initially, no longer each and every of the founders believed on your thought of "majority rule". it is the reason we've the shape, and the superb courtroom. If the U. S. Democracy have been "assume" to be in accordance with a majority of the inhabitants, segregation or perhaps slavery could nonetheless exist, women human beings could no longer have the main extraordinary to vote, and beer ought to be unlawful. Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the assertion of Independence and the invoice of Rights, wrote volumes against what he observed because of the fact the "tyranny of majority". Ben Franklin, who helped draft the shape, mentioned that majority rule is "2 wolves and one sheep identifying what's for dinner". 2nd, your question is stuffed with bait and hateful opinion and that i project you to place up purely one link helping your incontrovertible fact that "sufferers in hospitals can(did you recommend can not?) communicate with docs (be)reason they do no longer communicate English. Or a offender is desperate unfastened...". third, your writing is stuffed with grammar blunders and semantic inconsistencies. in case you your self have been in a position to chat / write / spell English wisely your argument could have greater authority. upload: it truly is humorous. None of those articles recommend making English the valid language. in actuality all of them replicate compassionate information in my view. To be honest, I purely asked you to link articles suggesting that public officers are having project speaking with non-English audio device, somewhat than articles that are strongly in desire of an valid language. via linking those articles, you're if truth be told declaring that, even even with the undeniable fact that public officers or perhaps firms can, and rightly could desire to, use creativity and mind's eye to chat with non-English audio device, we nonetheless choose an valid language. i visit argue that variety enriches our language and lifestyle, purely as lack of information and prejudice banalizes. and that i encourage to selection on your understand-how. i do no longer think which you likely ought to tell a doctor what's incorrect, or a cop what the suspect gave the effect of, considering you're an fool.

2016-12-13 09:30:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

That speaks volumes about our education system. It doesn't bother me personally. But your point is well taken.

2007-01-16 12:40:28 · answer #5 · answered by Smokin' Dragon 4 · 1 0

In a melting pot you're going to have this problem, right?

2007-01-16 13:26:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES! It bothers me!

2007-01-16 12:51:42 · answer #7 · answered by Urchin 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers