Both men obviously dedicated their lives to advancing their race. While the media martyrd him after his death, King during his life was best known as a trouble maker and incited many, many riots. Martin Luther king had very close ties to comunism and was said to be a commie, Hitler was a socialist to the core. Both men wanted to further his race at any cost and didn't care about the other races what so ever. Both men were very good speakers and fooled many people into doing their bidding. While King is often portrayed as a peace maker, recent documents are now showing he had a deep contempt and hatred for Jews. Hitler well he sort of did too. What do you all think?
2007-01-16 11:22:35 · 15 answers · asked by dramaqueen22801 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
i honestly heard the same thing about martin luther king. from some blacks mind you, they didnt know why we celebrated mlk day. hell, i dont know why we celebrate a whole month dedicated to blacks, if we had a month dedicated to whites, everything would go apeshit.
2007-01-16 14:07:30 · answer #1 · answered by MARY M 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋
While you certainly know how to exercise the gift of free speech, you cherish it neither as a gift nor as a means to keep us free by telling the Truth. However, your Freudian slip is the KIND of answer that reveals why your question is so ridiculous. Martin Luther King was a kind, good, decent, loving and God fearing man. He is credited with stopping race wars and preparing a way of peace for generations to come. He said he had been to the mountaintop and that he had a dream. And just like Moses and Joseph in the Old Testament, He led his people out of captitivity, gave them means through education and civil rights to feed and clothe their children, and they have become good stewards of God's holy blessings. And that is why Joseph was clothed in the Coat of Many Colors, a rainbow of promise for all peoples of the royale line of Christ the King. When the vanity of this generation passes, it is the children who will gather at the river, the river of the glory of God. It converges at the cross of His mercy. Be there and Be Fair.
2007-01-16 19:36:01 · answer #2 · answered by QueryJ 4 · 7⤊ 0⤋
You must have got your info from some white supremacist book.
That, or your red pigtails are too tight. The only reason Mr. King was a trouble maker is because the whites back then could not deal with the fact that he was right!! They wanted to slur him with whatever crap they could think of. Think before you open the cobwebs. By the way you do have the right to your opinion, just make sure it is yours.
2007-01-16 21:19:50 · answer #3 · answered by WB2003 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
.Yes and there were no death camps in Germany. This is what miserable people think. I pray you replace your misery.
Martin Luther King Jr., Fought for the hungry no matter what there race. I recall his speeches on Television . The government called him a commie to take away his power. White people were in a few of the PEACEFUL marches.
2007-01-16 19:32:11 · answer #4 · answered by janshouse justice for all 2 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Explain how you can put the words 'Hitler' and 'Socialist' in the same sentence. Hitler was a fascist. F A S C I S T.
Martin Luther King wanted black people to be treated with EQUALITY, not SUPREMECY.
Do some homework and stop being so narrow minded.
2007-01-16 19:27:51 · answer #5 · answered by Snowth 4 · 11⤊ 0⤋
The difference is Martin Luther King didn't order the execution of millions of people!
2007-01-16 20:14:34 · answer #6 · answered by Angel 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure Martin Luther had a million soldier at his beckoning and then proceeded to gas 6 million Jews.
2007-01-16 19:32:32 · answer #7 · answered by venom! 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
uuuuuh let me think.....NOOO!!! what the HECK are u thinking? MARTIN LUTHER KING wanted PEACE not like total chaos and massive KILLINGS!!?? what r u thinking i mean duhhhhh they're not similar??? what do they TEACH u in SCHooL?
2007-01-16 19:32:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
they both had big followings , Dr. King wanted equality , not superiority...He also handled this in a non-violent fashion ...there is NO similarity
2007-01-16 19:30:55 · answer #9 · answered by klunk 4 · 7⤊ 0⤋
i think that is some of the most stupid drivel i have ever heard. i have never heard anything like that before, and if you actually read this somewhere why didn't you list your sources?
2007-01-16 19:28:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋