2007-01-16 11:22:28 · 9 answers · asked by Yea Yea 4 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
The jury evaluated the evidence and said "not guilty". If the question refers to his book then Simpson's book may be tacky but "if i did it" deals with one chapter that is hypothetical and labeled fiction - a great part of the book likely is Simpson defending himself against false allegations. The book does not contain a confession nor does the chapter contain the actual attack by whoever committed the crime. Possibly the "If i did it" title and chapter was decided by the publisher for the sensational value which they thought would translate into higher book sales. It was the publisher who brought the deal to Simpson and offered the money. The rare opportunity to earn any income was likely taken to help provide for his family members - Simpson is paying the costs to put his kids through college etc. OJ has always maintained his innocence.
2007-01-17 22:46:09 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that you were the only one that thought he was guilty all this time, is that what you are trying to portray? hohohehe even the black community knew he was guilty all along it was about stickiin it to the man, the way it had been done to black people forever in society is all and white america FINALLY got a wake up call is all p.s. I am white
2007-01-16 19:29:44 · answer #2 · answered by plagam_extremam_infligere 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The world knew it when he led the L.A. police on that slow "chase" on the L.A. freeways . He should be forced to sell everything he owns to pay restitution to the Brown's & Goldman's even if he has to live in a hut . And that would be too good for him .
2007-01-17 00:26:08 · answer #3 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes O.J. is guilty & I think everyone in America knows it. Now he's trying to say his ghostwriter is the one who wrote the chapter about how he would have done "it". Lies & trying to blame others. I guess he still thinks he can convince folks of his innocence.
2007-01-16 19:28:49 · answer #4 · answered by mazell41 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course he's guilty.......and the jury that let him off should be totally ashamed of themselves. They were giving him thumbs up and everything.....bunch of idiots. I wonder what they are thinking now???
2007-01-17 00:13:36 · answer #5 · answered by ksgirl 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
OJ is guilty I hate him!
2007-01-16 19:34:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes I think he was guilty all along, he knew far too much about the murders not to be innocent.
I cant get why he is getting away with the crime though, when its obvious he did it, even now.
2007-01-16 19:40:25 · answer #7 · answered by scotgirl55 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah that bastard is guilty! Someone needs to wipe those smiles right off his face.
2007-01-16 20:19:27 · answer #8 · answered by sicilia 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Who cares??? Only O. J. will have to answer for what he did.
2007-01-16 20:33:21 · answer #9 · answered by Lottalady 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋