2007-01-16 10:56:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nah.....just Stalin....
(that t-shirt site is :))))
2007-01-16 11:00:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I have never equated Bush to Hitler...ever!
And, yes, I am a liberal.
And I fail to see the correlation between FDR and "The Desolate One"
I LOVE THE WORD DESOLATE!!!!!
SATAN!
2007-01-16 11:01:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about LBJ. He is the one who sent thousands and thousands to there deaths in Vietnam, and then because of his mistake, decided not to run for reelection for President. You never hear liberal berate him. Churchill order the fire bombing of Innocent civilians in Dresden, Germany which killed 40,000 men, women and children in ONE night. Truman ordered the fire bombing of over 60 cities in Japan even before we dropped the Atomic Bomb. Never hear about liberals talking to much about how bad they are. How many people know that Saddam was associated with a Muslim group that worked with the Nazi party during WW2?
2007-01-16 11:10:19 · answer #3 · answered by Dutch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah right on!
Other random comparisons you can make;
Big Bird is Andy Warhol!
Trent Lott is Jesus!
Cindy Shehan is Catherine the Great!
Keep goin, man you're doin awesome.
2007-01-16 11:01:38 · answer #4 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you able to furnish a CITE to returned up your claims? The liberals i be attentive to for my area could all say they hate Hitler lots better than George Bush -- inspite of the reality that Hitler, of direction, is lifeless and would not do lots in politics anymore. So i think of you're purely pulling this question out of your - uh -- returned pocket. i don't think of it fairly is rooted in political actuality. It seems to me such as you purely % to overcome up on "Liberals" - or a minimum of your photograph of liberals, your fantasy approximately what they suspect. As on your Hitler reference -- properly, please seem up "Godwin's regulation" sometime on the internet. in case you study Godwin's regulation, i think of you will see why your Hitler reference isn't too marvelous.
2016-10-31 07:30:10 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope just means bush is the modern day equivalent of hitler.
2007-01-16 11:01:14 · answer #6 · answered by freaky7up 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, how does that corralate? you can't even put the 2 in the same sentance! it isn't legal!
FDR- great president who got us out of the depression, created incredible public service prgrams and began the flourishing of the greatest country on the world
Bush- Ended it.
2007-01-16 11:00:16 · answer #7 · answered by Logical Rationalist 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither can be compared because Hitler was the epitome of evil.
2007-01-16 11:35:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
idk. Bush is not Hitler and FDR is not Satan. Both did a lot of controversial things. FDR's have benefited us, hopefully too will Bush's decisions.
2007-01-16 11:01:40 · answer #9 · answered by Daniel 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't seem to remember FDR starting any wars of aggression.
2007-01-16 10:59:30 · answer #10 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I guess so....
You're just too smart for us!!
I wish we were that tricky. Good thing this statement is based of facts, or I'd think it was outrageous, as would more than half of America.
2007-01-16 10:59:46 · answer #11 · answered by The Firebrand Transit 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋