Why do Libs insist on comparing President Bush to Hitler?

Answer 1

It is unacceptible that they do so! Shame on their lack of patriotism but their actions, as always, will come back to haunt them. I notice that not one of them can come up with a true comparison...they blow with the wind! Poor sad souls.

Answer 2

No, I compare Neocons to Fascists. There is a difference.
Bush was a deserter who never saw combat,
Can't put a complete sentence together un aided. is managed by handlers and was given the presidency by his dad.
Hitler was decorated with the Iron Cross for courage under fire as a dispatch runner, was gassed and saw combat up close.
He had a genius for oratory, burning convictions and a persistent vision of a vengeful and greater nation arising from the WW defeat and the political progress that followed.
Hitler ruthlessly oversaw the creation of an ethos, a political machine and doctrine and his supreme and absolute power as a dictator.
Bush can only get there in his dreams.
I see Bush as a wanabe dictator. He does not have the strategic plotting insight of a Stalin, the passion, ego and genius of a Hitler, the long term strategic perspective of a Mao, or the
political ruthlessness of a Mussolini. No comparison, still he and Cheney both need to be impeached and removed.
Bush is more like The Wizard of Oz. Can Toto be far off ?
Understand Hitler was one of the most evil political leaders in modern history. Bush is JUST evil. He is not even in the same league. Only about 30 % of Americans worship him and SS has to screen all his attendees at his rallies.

Answer 3

The only possible reason can be blunt ignorance. Those who do the comparison don't know anything about Hitler and his deeds. Bush may very wrong in his politics but he doesn't go round shouting the racial inferiority of religious and national groups to the extent that those groups must be systematicaslly, and brutally exterminated , by gas-fire-murder-poison-starvation,-slave labor, Also, Hitler was very successful in his wars, Bush is not.

Answer 4

it's simple - there are analogies that the so-called liberal media won't point out and hard questions that they won't ask.

for instance, during the bush/cheney 2004 campaign, in order to be admitted to a bush/cheney rally you either had to be a registered republican or be willing to sign a 'loyalty oath.'

hitler loved loyalty oaths.

the bush media machinery has worked very hard at making the word liberal - or as drug-addled gas-bag jethro limbaugh might say, 'libs.'

the way i hear the word 'libs' being used by cons is eerily similar to the way nazis used the word 'jew.'

either seemed to be somehow, magically, responsible for anything that ailed the culture or nation.

if cons don't like the nazi comparison, then they should consider stopping the nazi-like tactics...

Answer 5

Tell me; what's the difference between the two. Neither showed any respect or human life. Hitler did his thing for power. Bush does his thing for money & power. Bush could care less about the environment and civil rights, Bush is the bigger louser!

Answer 6

the guy feels like a entire and mutually as I agree George W. Bush is incompetent and a living respiration occasion of the Peter concept I actually doubt he's Adolf Hitler and that i've got self belief Ellison is a moron catering to the foilhatters and u.s. haters.

Answer 7

That's a fair question.

Maybe its because they both rely heavily on fear to control and manipulate the people.

They both had a propaganda minister.

They both used a "terrorist" attack as a tool of fear to gain greater control over the country and dismiss questions about this control.

They both invaded a country despite almost the entire rest of the world being against it.

They both ran their countries into massive debt by spending on a war that no one asked for and most of the world disapproved of.

They both made massive miscalculations that cost people their lives.

They both liked to surround themselves with "yes men" and refused to listen to dissenting opinions no matter what.

Now, we all know Bush is nowhere near as evil as Hitler was. He also is nowhere near as smart though, but there are more than a few similarities that are easy to see and pointing them out really pisses neo-con Bush lovers off, so it is an easy mark.

Answer 8

Because the libs you speak of are communists/morons. Hitler was many times more intelligent than Bush is (Bush is a moron.) Also, Hitler worked for the benefit of his countrymen (Germans) whereas Bush works only to benefit lobbyists and Israel.

Answer 9

I'm liberal and I hang out with a lot of liberals and no one compares Bush to Hitler. The worst Bush can reasonably be compared to is Pinochet.

Answer 10

Aha!!

You caught us again!!

Wow you guys really ARE too quick for us. I'm glad the bush-hitler comparison is documented, or I'd think that this claim is just a bunch of shite.

Answer 11

Why?
Because they simply have nothing better to do than to blame the nation's problems on him, and compare to hitler, only because they can.
The point is, the liberal has no logical thinking, he parrots what he hears from CNN-(Communist National Network)
or from the ACLU-(Anti Christ and Liberals United)
That's the truth.