Should the US take in Iraqi refugees?

Question

Just a simple poll

Answer 1

Orphaned children only......they haven't been brainwashed yet

Answer 2

No, that would just cause a massive debate and upheaval about whether or not we would be taking in potential terrorists, and also if we as the world's biggest military power should then be obliged to take in refugees from any or all other countries under siege by Muslim extremists or terrorists, like in Sudan.

I think the right move regarding the Iraqi refugees would be to move them safely to U.S. ally countries in the Middle East, like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan.

Answer 3

Yes we are morally obligated to.I think that many would go back home when the violence is better under control.

Something that does not get mentioned much that I think you may be aware of is that Iraq has the potential to have one of the healthiest and strongest economies in the world.If we can help them pull things together and keep outside influences to a minimum it may one day be a place where people go to make their fortunes.I don't think they will have any problem with those that fled coming back plus.

I think that in the short run all of the best and brightest leaving Iraq in a time of real need for them is a detriment but I can't really blame them for leaving either.If it were my country I would stay.

Answer 4

think of returned to WW2. We banned jap immigrants from entering or leaving the US as quickly as we've been attacked. Even the chinese language and those of the south east Asia have been additionally banned even inspite of the incontrovertible fact that we've been purely attacked by using the jap. Why? considering which you don't be attentive to who's relatively jap. the comparable with the middle east. the conventional American can not determine from an Iranian, Iraqi, Pakistani, Turk, or Afghanistanian. They do the comparable element with Hispanics. they are able to not determine from a Columbian, Mexican, Guatemalan, Argentinean, Cuban, or Puerto Rican. maximum all communicate a foreign places language that they don't additionally be attentive to. all of them seem comparable from the middle east or maybe interior the Hispanic cultures. by using ways, we've not been attacked by using the different group different than those from the middle East. They call us over to "help" them, yet then they undesirable mouth us mutually as we are there. They attack us and burn our flags, yet they choose our help? we've, under the radar of the conventional American, delivered in over 350.000 refugees from over there. Over 0.5 have been granted 4 year visas, gotten government housing information, food information, loose scientific care, and actually do not ought to artwork in the event that they don't % to even inspite of the incontrovertible fact that they have got been granted artwork status. Why interior the heck could you think of we would % greater people who must be conceivable sleeper cells or coming under the guise of "Iraqi" citizenship? interior the middle East, considering that time in memorium, the tribes, cities, sects, and religions, have been battling over slightly barren area. The mentality of "in the experience that your not with us your against us" that has been drilled interior all their human beings for over 2500 yrs is what reasons their very own strife. we don't choose every person that has this chip on their shoulder or in one breath asks for our help and with yet another condemns us. you % refugee status? not in u.s.. fix your country first. coach some admire. stop biting the hand that feeds you. Then we can communicate approximately you coming over. No offense to any Iraqi's on right here, yet you will not enable human beings like that to return on your country and do the comparable element.

Answer 5

Within reason, certainly. There's nothing wrong with *legal* immigration of *law abiding* foreigners. Though any 'refugee' who comes that far, especially to a place so much better than they came from, isn't likely to ever return.

Answer 6

They should, but Bush says only 500 max this year. After all that the US has done to harm them, the least they can do is allow the refugees in if they want to go there.

Answer 7

What refugees?

We are building a Utopia there. Why would they want to leave Utopian Iraq to come here?

(Sarcasm)

Answer 8

But I thought all Iraqis were terrorists; that's why it's OK to kill women, children, and the elderly. Won't taking in refugees be letting terrorists into our vunerable nation?

Answer 9

Of course not, why come to a racist country

Answer 10

Yes, they should.