This number is three times the death toll caused by Saddam. Saddam was hanged for crimes against humanity. What should we do with Bush? This is a blatant crime against humanity.
2007-01-16 09:40:53 · 16 answers · asked by Optimistic 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Saddam was a worthless bastard, but has hanging him solved anything? No.
Nor would hanging Bush.
In both cases, the man is not the problem; he's only a symptom.
2007-01-16 17:09:01 · answer #1 · answered by x 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he should not be executed for those deaths. Double check your facts - how many of those deaths are directly attributible to the US Military? How many to Iraqi insurgents, terrorists or others? There is no comparison to the unspeakable crimes Saddam committed to what is happening now. He (Saddam) put people to death who didn't agree with him. He systematically executed multitudes because they didn't want to follow his rule. He executed many because they failed at an assigned mission. Imagine working for a boss whose punishment for a failed assignment was death? Quit buying into what the media feeds you and do some digging, you will find that those numbers are not correct in respect to the US Military, of which Bush is commander in chief.
2007-01-16 09:54:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You think Saddam is only resposible for 10,000 lives, do you live in a cave too? You're a blatant crime to humanity yourself because of your ignorance.
2007-01-16 09:57:54 · answer #3 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't forget that justification for the war was that Saddam Hussein violated several UN resolutions and the US-imposed no-fly zone. The no-fly zone was imposed to keep him from killing every last Kurd.
BTW, are you really such a fan on Che that you would honestly use his picture instead of avatar??? Do you know anything about Che Guevara???
2007-01-16 09:52:20 · answer #4 · answered by snvffy 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Actually, most were killed by insurgents and not Bush. Bush also did not request that people should be specifically killed for their colour, religion or disagreement with his regime. They are not political prisoners, etc.
This is really an idiotic argument (and I mean no offense by this) but it's clearly an apples to oranges comparison.
2007-01-16 15:10:22 · answer #5 · answered by Daisy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't even think he will be sentenced since he didn't do it by hands, nor is their evidence because no one has spoken. Plus the congress said A-OK for the war so...I guess nothing will happen to Bush.
2007-01-16 09:47:34 · answer #6 · answered by Silvara 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So, you're saying all 30,000+ were killed by our military? Well if that's the case, maybe we should have executed FDR and Kennedy. They got us into WW2 and Vietnam, and more civilians were killed by the U.S. military in those wars than you can imagine. Think about it.
2007-01-16 09:53:22 · answer #7 · answered by Robert C 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What WE should do is treat the President with respect instead of acting like treasonous morons .
2007-01-16 15:56:08 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are a complete fool. The vast number of those deaths were Iraqis killing other Iraqis.
2007-01-16 09:56:33 · answer #9 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Cmon....give me a break?? How about we execute the The President & CEO of Lysol for killing 99.9% if germs????? My answer makes as much sense as your blatant statement and question that you made!!!!
Did you have any friends,family, or co-workers that died in the WTC on 911??? I didnt think so!!
2007-01-16 09:52:41 · answer #10 · answered by fxbeto 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋