out of stupidity perhaps but really do we have the capacity? we are stuck in iraq and afghanistan we cannot manage iran this should be common sense.we can go in and take over but the economic cost will be so high it will come collapsing on us.then we will be forced to pull out and the regime we leave shall be 100 times more vicious than the one we found.why not explore diplomacy?
2007-01-16 09:40:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The smartest thing the US could do is to have an open dialog with Iran. The best place to do it would be in a neutral setting such as India, Switzerland or Sweden.
2007-01-16 09:49:42 · answer #1 · answered by Paul K 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i haven't got self assurance monetary sanctions are an act of conflict.i imagine it truly is effective,might want to properly be effective the international tries to sparkling up this challenge by demanding international relations contributors. even as I understand Iran is demonized and am conscious Israel does have nukes, I at the same time confident Iran ought to no longer have nuclear guns.The Iranian authorities does have ties with Hezbollah and earlier to 9/11 even al quaida. Iran claims to needs to apply nuclear technologies only for power.If it truly is genuine they ought to settle for the availability the international community made on June first in Vienna. That stated at the same time it truly is sparkling Necons nonetheless opt for to attack and we ought to continually be vigilant to get no longer lied into yet another conflict both besides the undeniable fact that the version right it truly is u.s. isn't appearing unilaterally for now.i opt for to imagine it truly is effective
2016-11-24 21:50:07 · answer #2 · answered by miceli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way as far as a ground invasion goes. Iran is much bigger in size and there are many more people. Bombing there nuclear reactors however might work if we can back it up and just launch an all out attack . A ground invasion would never work.
2007-01-16 09:55:55 · answer #3 · answered by blood and ashes 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. i believe the result ould be failure.there needs to be more thought on the cost. yes diplomacy should be tried. so far it has just been mindless rhetoric between bush and ahmadinjen.
edit.tighten up the oil spigot on who? israel?
2007-01-16 09:59:08 · answer #4 · answered by J Q Public 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad doesn't believe in diplomacy. Remember what he and his friends did to the US diplomats?
Wait and see, the next 20 years will be extremely interesting.
2007-01-16 09:54:18 · answer #5 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We can't...all Iran would have to do is tighten up the oil spigot a 'little' bit.
2007-01-16 09:47:56 · answer #6 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"Stuck in iraq and afghanistan?"
Hey look, john kerry is up to his usual antics.
Please learn to think for yourself. When you get older, you'll get smarter.
2007-01-16 09:51:34 · answer #7 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
N O!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-16 09:47:25 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋