English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why can liberals continue to hammer President Bush about false accusations re: the Air National Guard, but conservatives cannot mention Teddy Kennedy's midnight swim on Chappaquiddick as being to "far in the past" when Teddy's "indiscretion" happened a year later?

What makes this man "untouchable"?


http://www.ytedk.com/

2007-01-16 09:13:15 · 18 answers · asked by Bawney 6 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

The neo-libs are too busy rewriting history to be bothered learning any of it.

2007-01-16 09:18:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 4

I'm not sure what you are getting at. Both sides bring these things up all of the time. Where's the double standard? No one is stopping anyone from talking about Teddy and Chappaquiddick, or from talking about Bush's special treatment and early release from the National Guard. Both subjects seem to be pretty fairly beaten to death on YA on a regular basis...

2007-01-16 09:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Are you asking about the validity of the accusations or the timeliness? You're question asks both. You maintain that Bush was innocent but provide no proof, and you imply that Kennedy is guilty and similarly offer no proof. The link you provide is to a highly partisan web site with an agenda.

2007-01-16 09:25:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The ones harping on Bush's war record aren't the same that are calling Teddy's accident in the past.

2007-01-16 09:19:20 · answer #4 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 2 0

He's untouchable due to his money, and media hype. The media has done so much to blow up their image as to make them more like movie stars who are entitled to criminal behavior, drunkness,
and immorality.
That the good but very stupid people of mass. vote him in every year is a tribute to their massive political power in that unfortunate state.

If you read the history of the kennedyas you can see that they got their riches at the expense of small american farmers and families. Prohibition wa sberought on by the Joseph Kenndy and others like him in order to gain control of the whisky business which they did breaking thousands of farmers in the process, bring on the depression and making kennedy rich.

The kennedys are one of the least educated people who ever were elected to congress. John Kennedys son could not even pass the state Legal bar exam . His (john kennedy's on contribution to fame was getting shot, as was his brother bobby. .). Tedkennedy's bigest contribution was leaving a young wpoman to drown in his car, waiting several hours to tell soemone he killed her and than wait for the news medai to rum headline sof what a wonderful; man he was

2007-01-16 09:28:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Libs are always untouchable. They make the rules about mistakes so therefore they cannot make them. Whenever I want to bring up things dems want forgotten I choose WACO. Most libs scream about the innocent men women and children dying in Iraq. Why don't we ask Janet Reno why she killed innocent Americans exercising there freedom of religion at Waco?

2007-01-16 09:24:18 · answer #6 · answered by blood and ashes 1 · 0 1

It's all in your head. The air national gaurd thing was not false and righties constantly pick on Kennedy. You just dont pay attention to those little details.

2007-01-16 09:20:51 · answer #7 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 2 2

ted (pour me another one) can do no wrong he is a democrat. Just like all of the other democrats he is the greatest. Do you ever notice that forget about the crap that their party does? Last time I checked W didn't forget to report his girlfriend was drowning in his car

2007-01-16 09:46:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because Bush is the President and the Liar in chief. Ted Kennedy is not President.

2007-01-16 09:19:30 · answer #9 · answered by JS 3 · 4 4

Oh good ANOTHER irrelevant Kennedy reference to sidestep Bush's foreign policy blunders!

And the war in Iraq is unimportant,is that what you are trying to say?

2007-01-16 09:19:22 · answer #10 · answered by Cut The Crap 2 · 3 2

Democrats like to dredge up the past with people who oppose them so that they can discredit them. But when the same tactic is used with them, they tell us it happed 30+ years ago so get over it.

2007-01-16 09:21:24 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers