I'm a democrat.. and though I want the troops home as quickly as is possible.. I would feel much better just having a detailed plan of action with decent timetables.. of course somethings would have to be modified in the field.. War is a fluid thing.. but right now I feel like the Bush administration is just pissing in the wind and hoping for it to change directions. Some would argue that's "giving the enemy a date that we will withdrawl" .. well if we actually do what is in the plan of action there wouldn't be an enemy by that time now would there? so anyway.. any thoughts are welcome.
2007-01-16
08:33:12
·
3 answers
·
asked by
pip
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Obviously the term National Security is not a word in the Bush administration.. for he hasn't done anything that has actually made us safer. And as far as telling the enemy.. maybe you misunderstand what I mean by detailed.. I don't mean troops deployments and times of landing.. A set goal with a decent strategy.. i'm guessing you haven't ever written out plans of action have you? I have.. it's part of my line of work.. so take a step out of your limited scope and realize that not everything is one sided.
2007-01-16
08:51:17 ·
update #1
I do agree that the troops are in a tough spot and that maybe some extra understanding should be given for mistakes they have made.. but I think if you give them slack upfront you are removing what few strings of morality are associated with war.. then what is left? meaningless killing and nothing more. Plus, you can always re-asses and adapt the plan as needed.. if near the end of your plan things aren't as they should be, you right a new plan.. even if they are as they should be you still right new plans.. it's part of it.. and it gives people a since of progress.. something that is lacking at this time.
2007-01-16
09:00:22 ·
update #2