marry someone knowing that they two of you could never have children together?
2007-01-16 08:14:53 · 38 answers · asked by Chistiaŋ 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Absolutely I would Fox. No question.
Children are an expression of a couples love, but not necessary in the context of the long term commitment to one another.
Children grow and leave the home. That's the reality. We raise them, hopefully with as much grace and kindness as we can, but they leave.
We're left (at least we hope and dream) with our spouse.
Adoption is always an option if children are valued, desired, and wanted in a home.
2007-01-16 18:03:27 · answer #1 · answered by JC 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Honestly No. If I had no children and that is something that I would want more in this world I would not be able to adopt. Because it might be the same feeling in having a baby but, it's not the same experience as having the baby in your womb. That to me is the most precious gift that I wish everybody can experience.
In the relationship there will be problems if one could not have children, even thought it might be okay at first.
This is my point of view.
2007-01-16 08:29:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. If I knew they could compliment my life, even without having children. Note, I did not say complete my life...as your SO should never complete your life...but simply compliment it in a way no other can.
I would consider the options as well...can we adopt? can we be foster parents? And if the answer is still no...and I am truly in love with them, knowing I will still be satisfied...yes, i would marry them anyway.
2007-01-16 08:20:08 · answer #3 · answered by Shakira 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually had to ask myself that question, in a previous relationship, though it ended up being moot....
As a man who has reached his forties without the blessing of children, I do admit that there's a part of me that would be inclined to say no, but the flip side of my accumulated years is that I know that I am capable of being happy without that, so I can say that the inability to have children would not be a deal-breaker.
2007-01-16 17:00:24 · answer #4 · answered by x 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
D...In todays world, with so much divorce, and abuse ,of each other, and ,of the children, those sweet innocent children ,who are so affected by such harm...and, babies born everyday, and they are just put aside, because no one wants them... Today 's couple's marry ,and if they enter into this most sacred of unions they must both be honest, with eachother, and themselves, because one day will come, and he or she, will want a child, and if they have that most precious Love between them...... that is so very rare, they can save a child, a baby, a set of twins, a newborn ,and God will bless them all, each, and everyday because, they have saved a life, and have called this life ,their own......bless you luv kara
2007-01-16 08:44:46 · answer #5 · answered by COOKIE 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-01-16 08:20:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the past I would have said no, but knowing what I know about myself now I'd say certainly. Of course, I'm already married and have a daughter, but I like being hypothetical for arguments' sake :)
2007-01-16 08:18:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Firstly, I'll never get married. But if in fact I did, hell yes! That would be a bonus! I have one child and would be completely and totally happy to not have any more.
Kisses
2007-01-16 08:27:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I love someone there are always other ways. If they want kids, we could adopt or have a surrogate mother. Love comes first in everything for me. :-) Yes I would marry them :-)
Peace:
Amanda
2007-01-16 08:19:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure I had a vasectomy in 1977 two days after I filed for divorce had no desire to pay support for more than my 3 kids..
2007-01-16 08:20:02 · answer #10 · answered by chiefof nothing 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋