English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I sure did. How humiliating. A fitting legacy for this lying adulterer. Woudn't you agree?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

2007-01-16 07:53:34 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

29 answers

I Cheered, actually......

And to all of his defenders who say it was only a BJ...He was impeached and Disbarred for Lying to a Grand Jury
He also tried to obstruct justice by getting others to lie and destroy evidence....

And I agree it is amazing all of the people who say he wasn't impeached...looking at you <>
He 100% was...
Here it is on the Official White house website
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html
HIS Presidential Library website...
http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/bios-WJC.html

Also he didn't commit adultery????
DICTIONARY.com
<>
voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her lawful spouse.
<>
sexual relations or a sexual coupling, esp. coitus
<>
any sexual activity between individuals

Know YOUR facts <> before your "scold or Mock" anyone else

2007-01-16 08:01:37 · answer #1 · answered by SALMON 5 · 5 4

OK...they tried to impeach him it looked like it was gonna stick but it did not. Look it up people!! It was close but no cigar!! Anyways I can give a **** less if he lied about a BJ geez!! At least he did not start a war under false pretenses, I think that is alot worse don't you? Get over it Bush followers....quit going back to this already!! Mr.Bush screwed up royally in this Iraq mess now just shut the hell up and stop crying about the Clinton BJ and try to fix our future.

2007-01-16 17:48:47 · answer #2 · answered by Rhionnan 3 · 0 0

I didn't, but I do laugh at the fact Bush hasn't been impeached yet for lying to this country, using propaganda to support a war against a country who posed no threat to us.

Oh and Billy? Clinton was not a sexual predator, he's never had sexual relations with anyone underage. And if your referring to Monica, she was 22 at the time the affair started.

Now, Mark Foley, there's a sicko.

2007-01-16 16:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1 0

No, I didn't laugh. Clinton's actions were shameful and not worthy of the office of president. Imagine how other countries looked at us.

Regardless of popular belief, a bj wasn't the only worry America had at the time, but it was the only thing being dealt with.

I feel that it would be in the best interest of those who tend to have foot in mouth disease, to look up a few facts before they speak, or write, whatever the case may be. Do you people really believe that America's problems with terrorist just began when Bush took office? That prior to Bush's presidency, all Clinton had to do was chase tail because nothing of importance was happening?

Edit: Adultery without sexual intercourse -- Jesus Christ warned, "You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust after her has committed adultery already with her in his heart."

Besides, why wouldn't he lie about intercourse since he lied peroid?

2007-01-16 16:07:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2 2

No. I was disgusted that the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the land was guilty of lying under oath and indicted with obstruction of justice.

Followed by shock at the Democrat reaction of support for such a scumbag, and a renewed assault on the GOP by the mainstream media.

2007-01-16 16:04:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I didn't laugh.
To see liberals and women defending sexual harressment.
Accepting the idea you can smear a victim's name because he was Pro-choice.
Lie under oath which is a felony.
Spin the story to think it was all about 1 bj which it wasn't.
Also have to define the word "is" for someone who is the commander and chief is a bit too much.
To this day if you ask a liberal that is all they said it was about.

So sexual harressement laws be thrown right now.

2007-01-16 16:12:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I laughed at the sad state of this country given that that hunger, homelessness, sub par education, proper medical care and jobs going overseas were not as important as president Bill Clinton having extra marital affairs.
This country has it's priorities twisted. Those of you that care more for Bill getting impeached for getting a BJ than the other matters at hand, are a sick reflection on the major flaws that are idealistic tumors on this country.
Wake up people.

2007-01-16 16:00:51 · answer #7 · answered by hirofuri 3 · 4 4

Sad. People like Maegan G (above) still maintain he wasn't impeached. How little do we know in this country.

Clinton WAS impeached. He wasn't "convicted", but yes, he was impeached (as carried out by the U.S. House).

EDIT: apparantly her answer was removed. Well, I guess that's something.

FURTHER EDIT: Okay, change the above to Tab H (a poster below) and my statement holds true.

2007-01-16 15:57:38 · answer #8 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 4 2

I agree (although farkas makes a valid point - it's more sad than humorous)! The man was basically a disgrace, and now yet another slick Clinton is trying to get back in there.

2007-01-16 15:56:16 · answer #9 · answered by Joe C 5 · 5 2

I laughed at how pathetic the Reps are, that they can only try to defeat one of the most popular Prezs in history on some minor detail. Yes, lying to a grand jury about sex is a minor detail.

BTW - Clinton did not commit adultery. Look up the word before you use it.

2007-01-16 16:03:46 · answer #10 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers