Yes, in fact, she is. Most people are not aware of this, but she has been secretly seeing Prince Charles for a number of months, and the two plan to make a life together very soon, when it all becomes public.
Once they are married, and Charles becomes king, she will be Queen Victoria, ushering in a new Victorian age in England.
Or, she might just stay with the soon-to-be-scientologist soccer player, and be the next Katie Holmes.
2007-01-16 08:02:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by generalchris7 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
Nah...she's not likely to disturb the monarchy in the same way that Diana did! While they both command similar media fascination, there is no real connection between the two...
...unless of course she leaves David and takes up with Prince William!
Actually, I think she is a VERY intelligent lady indeed...she's turned herself into a multi-million pound money machine and let's face it, being her husband has done a lot for David Beckham too! They're not as daft as they look.
2007-01-17 00:30:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kickinkitty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely NOT! Victoria Beckham, while good looking, is as common as dirt. Although she called herself "Posh Spice," she is as "new money" as they come. To my knowledge, she did not attend any noteworthy school, and I doubt she attended university. The Late Diana, Princess of Whales, was the daughter of the 8th Earl Spencer. Although this made her a "commoner" in the eyes of the Royals, Lady Diana Spencer was certainly not a commoner. Beyond her pedigree, she also dedicated her life to a number of noble deeds, such as charities and foundations. Victoria Beckham's only charity, besides those that get her name in the paper, is herself. Diana has become the stuff of history, whereas Victoria Beckham is just yesterday's news. I can also assure you that she says "note paper" instead of "writing paper;" she says "mantlepiece" instead of "chimney piece'" and I'm not even going to address her low-borne accent.
2007-01-16 07:55:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by godofsparta 2
·
7⤊
1⤋
Diana was aristocracy. Victoria Beckham is a chavette.
There is NO comparison.
2007-01-16 12:33:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by castle h 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've seen some ridiculous questions on this site, but that one comes close to being the most ridiculous...
Thicktoria has dark hair and Princess Diana was a blond....
2007-01-16 09:52:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by sarch_uk 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hardly. Princess Diana was, and still is, loved. Victoria Beckham is mostly hated.
2007-01-16 07:55:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by b97st 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, she's not. Never, hell I remember the days of the Spice Girls when Geri Halliwell was the favorite spice, now everyone wants Victoria. And I even remember Prince William loving Baby Spice, Emma Button.
2007-01-16 11:49:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not even comparable. How does she show her intelligence? Through fashion? The only time you see a story on Victoria is when she is dressed to kill (or thrill) or is hanging on David's arm, or producing another baby or quickly getting back her bod after another baby. Please. I have NEVER read where her charitable works are reported. Besides, David is far far far better looking than Prince Charles (except that David knows it) I think both Victoria and David are stuck up snobs out for themselves and no one else.
2007-01-16 07:52:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mickey 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
There was only one Princess Diana, Victoria Beckham ain't even close...All Victoria's done is slap on makeup! (Rest my case)
2007-01-16 07:54:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Diana had Charisma. Posh has no talent, no skills and no future. She's a footballers wife and one who bottled it. He was the genius of his generation. Look at Gigsy, still playing at the top level. Becks in LA. Rubbish. No wonder soccer is a girls game in the States.
2007-01-16 07:58:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋