All that I've heard is criticism and Defeatist bickering. Someone please let me know what the democrats alternative battle plan is for Iraq. Give me a DETAILED plan to WIN not LOOSE.
2007-01-16 07:38:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Um - here is start.
Disarm all militias, no matter who they are friends with.
How is that for a start....?
Here is another....don't align ourselves with anybody, but the RULE OF LAW.
Ready for a third? Allow international companies in to help with the rebuilding..
Need more -
Listen to the Generals, not CEO's of companies that make a war profit.
2007-01-16 07:41:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
initially i'm no longer a Republican Calling this an unjust conflict is in basic terms LAME without backing it up. "Why couldn't or not that is "unpatriotic" to no longer provide those infantrymen proper care even as they go back living house" wasent it the Democrats that the position attempting to diminish funding for this conflict? Are you attempting to say that that is more effective perfect if our solders had no guns or bulletproof jackets see you later as they get good care even as they arrive living house? information FLASH: they gained't be comeing living house becuse the Democrats killed them! maximum Republicans keep in mind that Democrats do not help the conflict in basic terms to get into the White living house. Take John Kerry or Hillary Rodham Clinton they both voted for the conflict yet once they began operating for the White living house they did not help the conflict. Hmm.... you imagine they could be declaring that to get some more effective votes? And that isn't any longer in basic terms those 2 different Democrats operating for President are doing an same concern. Now what's going to we get by technique of ending this conflict? properly, fist off i imagine all of us keep in mind that once end this conflict the terrorist will see this as there victory including to more effective terror attacks. Now that the U.S. is out of Iraq who will be garding the oil wells? no individual? properly we now understand the position the Terrorist will attack first. Ha-ha you concept gas costs the position intense now! Oh, shall we no longer ignore a mess of those those who helped the U.S. (you recognize those that helped us locate the Terrorist) and the law enforcement officials and the Iraq military. what's going to take position to all those good those who believe us a lot? properly in our very last conflict "desert hurricane" all those human beings the position killed. And when we went lower back we did not understand why they hated us a lot. And shall we no longer forget absolutely everyone that died for the U.S. in this conflict may have died in ineffective. Our Troops extremely believe that they are making a huge difference in this international. Makeing it safer and a more effective perfect position why can't the Democrats in basic terms have alittle position self belief in our armed foces and enable them end there interest?
2016-10-15 07:52:04 · answer #2 · answered by applebee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Polling Party has two plans, both of which include ,whats that defeatest word they like to use ,oh yea, redeployment of our troops. One is to redeploy them to Okinowa.. Murtha hasn't been able to convince me how this plan has any military significants.The other deployment plan is to pull our soldiers out of the hot zones and set up camp in the Northern mountains.... hm mm . I bet that would stop all those insurgents... or would they become more empowered by what they would consider a victory and take the opportunity to set up a ji had nation.( of course the Democrats will consider it "redeployment") .
2007-01-16 08:01:33 · answer #3 · answered by bereal1 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First you have to define WIN. I believe winning is no longer possible. So the only solution would be how not to lose. But we certainly don't want to loose!
Another possibility is to get surrounding nations involved, since most of them don't want chaos in Iraq. Another one would be to divide the country up into separate countries. Another would be to admit we need help from the UN and allow their peacekeeping forces to take over. Another would be to simply promote another ruthless dictator to take over so we can fight this war again in 20 years.
2007-01-16 07:43:41 · answer #4 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Interesting you have no Dems answering with anything tangible...very interesting.
The one reply has no real practicality in the real world. I mean it was the international community that corrupted the Iraqi food for oil debaucle and got rich by supporting the enemy of the US.
I am a Dem and my strategy would be far to the right of most Dems...and Repubs for that matter.
Still a very good question and I am eager to hear any positive answers.
2007-01-16 09:06:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I like to think we are no longer there to win or loose but to correct the mess our president made...there are no answers as Bush put us between a rock and hard place..The best we can do is ride the storm and wait for the calm !!
2007-01-16 07:50:18 · answer #6 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They have no plan.
Wait, wait, this news just in..............
The Democrats have announced their plan to solve the countrys most pressing issue. RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I knew they would think of something.
2007-01-16 08:28:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Very Simple Answer to this one.
THROW BUSH , HIS GANG OF THUGS OUT OF WHITE HOUSE IN THE NEXT 24 HOURS , IMPEACH THE BUNCH OF THEM & THEN SEND THEM TO GUANTANMO BAY TO BE GUARDED BY AL-QAEIDA !!!
2007-01-16 07:55:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Free BJs and pot for all Iraqis.
2007-01-16 08:10:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
They have no plan. Their plan to to make you think they have a plan.
2007-01-16 08:04:12 · answer #10 · answered by Bill 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋