English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Now, which is it? Is Bush some kind of evil genius who orchestrates and coordinates an attack on his own country in order to line his pockets and those of his Zionist allies?

Or his he a bumbling idiot who can barely speak and simply blundered into his position the first time because of daddy and the second time because his followers are dumber then he is...

Unless your in INGSOC, you cannot believe both. So let's have it Neo-Libs... Which is it???

2007-01-16 07:10:49 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

Its just plane and simple liberal hypocrisy. Take for example their stereotyping of conservatives (yes I know its ironic that the libs are supposedly so open minded and tolerant, yet so condescending and prone to stereotyping anyone who disagrees with them).

Firstly, we're all inbred southern nascar watching trailer trash religious nuts

Next we're rich oil drinking CEO big wigs who are keeping the poor down for our own gain

So which is it? And your question is another excellent example. Is Bush an evil genius who can trick an entire nation, or an idiot and a chimp? The libs simply use any number of baseless insults to promote their agendas, none of which have any basis or founding whatsoever. Thanks for pointing out their hypocrisy

2007-01-16 08:30:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It never fails to amuse me that some folks insist on thinking it is only liberals who detest George Bush. I'm one of the millions of the moderates who helped vote in a Democratic Congress to put some checks and balances on this out of control incompetent. I've never put credence in conspiracy theorists, and neither do most people, whether liberal, democrat, conservative, moderate or republican. Bush is not stupid, he is incompetent in the job he performs. I'm sure that he is intelligent enough to have been successful at some other venture, but this one certainly wasn't it. I voted for the man the first time around, but by 2004 I was uncomfortably aware that Bush had become a danger to the United States and could very well be capable of starting a world war in the Middle East. His arrogance and stubborness supercedes any talent he may have had for the job of President, and his incompetence is now the stuff of legend. Perhaps it would be wise for the right wingers who throw stones at libs to now throw off their blinders and start acknowledging that many Republicans are starting to withdraw their support for this President. Or do these Republicans magically become neo-libs now by acknowledging the truth at last?

2007-01-16 15:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Actually Bush is a bit of both.

He is evil, though not necessarily a genius. He is simply following the plan laid out by the one he and others like him serve, which is NOT the American people.

He and his handlers put forth the persona of a bumbling idiot in order to supply us with the disinformation neccesary to refute any claim as to the above.

So the answer is both. I am not INGSOC (whatever that is) and I believe both to be true. Somewhat.

2007-01-16 15:21:04 · answer #3 · answered by Flynn380 3 · 4 2

Dictator Dumbya is an idiot savant who's narrow genius talent is doing evil. And the other coup plotters give him a LOT of help in their distruction of the Constitution as we have historically know it. Will the new Congress be enough to stop this?? Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!

2007-01-16 16:27:07 · answer #4 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1 1

Neither.

Bush isn't entirely dumb, nor is he entirely evil. He is just a stubborn man who refuses to accept opposing viewpoints and will never be swayed by things like facts or reality.

Both elections he "won" were the most corrupt elections in our history, in one he went to court to prevent a recount he would have lost, and in the second he cheated using various forms of election fraud in 7 states.

By the way INGSOC wasn't Socialist, it was Fascist. Just like the Third Reich, saying one thing and being another. It's the right wing that uses INGSOC ideals.

2007-01-16 15:25:50 · answer #5 · answered by vertical732 4 · 3 1

I think it is pretty clear that he is just in over his head with this presidency. I don't for a minute believe that he was plotting, or is even capable of plotting, against the people of his own country in order to line his own pockets.
That being said, stupidity does not change the fact that mostt of his decision were based on plain old stupid ideas or bad information. either way, he makes the decisions, so if they are the wrong ones, he is the person to blame.
Anyone who claims that he conspired in 9/11 or anything else that is going on right now is just stupid, he just was incapable of preventing or dealing with the situations.
No one should be surprised by his results, who in their right minds elects a man to run the country knowing full well he was a below average student and a party animal in his early adult years? We elected a moron and got moronic results.

2007-01-16 15:22:18 · answer #6 · answered by answerman 4 · 4 3

George Bush comes across as a person of average education,regardless of the paperwork that says otherwise, ,possessing average speaking skills,surrounding himself with a circle of persons that come across as secretive and self centered.The fact that he is President(twice) is a larger reflection on the American voters,than on the person in question

2007-01-16 15:18:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Bush himself is extremely simple minded and void of conscience. He really can't understand why so many people do not see things the way he does. He can't reason beyond the next step as in what that step will probably lead to.

His handlers are very shrewd and intelligent. They just happen not to care at all about right and wrong. Their motivation has been and always will be money and power. Carl Rove is a political genius. He is also very underhanded and will not bat an eye at breaking the law to achieve a goal.

2007-01-16 15:15:23 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2 6

The people that control him are the first choice.

He is the second.

(I don't believe anybody orchestrated the attack on the US other than the terrorists. I do believe his idiocy made it easier. However, his handlers are evil for many reasons.)

2007-01-16 15:19:07 · answer #9 · answered by capu 5 · 3 2

he's not quite a bumbling idiot... but I think he is incompetent...

I don't really believe in the "Zionist" theories...

and I thought Reagan was a neo-lib?

2007-01-16 15:18:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers