Why isn't the US taking the situation in Darfur seriously and why haven't we done anything to end it ?

Answer 1

Because they are poor black people.Same thing happened in Louisiana.If it had happened in Boston we would have sent help.

Answer 2

If you can get every liberal politician or activist whining about Darfur now to sign a contract stating:

"I will not criticize US troops for enforcing UN resolutions, freeing a country, and killing the bad guys. I will not shout that, 'America has no right to be the world's policeman' while simultaneously demanding that America police the world. Nor will I approve a military intervention plan at first to appear tough, an then do a 180 when people start dying and my looney hyper-pacifist base starts spouting conspiracy theories."

But it won't happen. I would bet $1000 that at least half of liberal the politicians who demand we send troops to Darfur would be criticizing Bush, the USA, etc. within 1 month of the start of any military operation there. I guarantee it, it happened in Iraq.

Answer 3

I think our plate is full right now. It disappoints me that the rest of the world is dependant upon the united states to solve everyone elses problems. I think what is going on in Darfur is sad, however - we can only do so much in the world. Our focus has been on the middle east - until that is solved I cant see us jumping head first into anything else right now. I think other countries need to help the USA right now so we can accomplish more in the world TOGETHER. <3

Answer 4

on condition that some people right here sound to comprehend how plenty peoples exaggerate the reality of the U. S. being the worlds chief to violate international places for funds or oil, permit me tell you, that, definite Darfur have numerous oil, even with the undeniable fact that, the chinese language national Petroleum employer holds the vast oil concession in southern Darfur. chinese language infantrymen are presupposed to be keeping chinese language oil hobbies. there is not any interest to chinese language puppet, the u . s . a . to pass head to head affront the rustic that carry maximum of its bonds and US forex. additionally, UN observers say they have greater useful weapons than the Sudanese military, and are receiving components by utilising air. on condition that u . s . a . is unquestionably topping China on being extreme point hypocrites, a conspiration concept might carry a sturdy floor. So in certainty, the U. S. are feeding the conflict, quantity of loss of life does not mather in the rustic that basically think of green green green ! And to that, i might upload, off the situation, it is have been hispanic designation of Gringo comes... It exchange into the voters of helpful and South united states of america who began to shoot that to the U. S. infantrymen violating their united states of america in the path of the help of sanguinary corrupted chief who the place promising the U. S. economic help of its hobbies. It meant : green pass. Get the F*** out and stay the place you belong. as we communicate, ordinarily all international locations think of u . s . a . coming of their united states of america in worst then any political or human reason.

Answer 5

A larger question is why isn't the UN taking Darfur seriously? And what about the otehr African nations? They aren't concerned?

Answer 6

Put some oil or something else we want and we'll be there before nightfall.

Just saving people because it's the humane thing to do isn't on the agenda.

Funny how fast the world has forgotten the Holocaust.

Answer 7

It's not the US Government's job to be the protector of other countries' citizens. I feel sorry for them and I do what I can to donate to places that can help, but strictly speaking, the American government is just that -- the American government. Help should come from the private sector, churches, the UN, etc., not from the government.

Answer 8

Everyone wants the U.S. to butt out of other countries business, haven't you heard? The only thing the U.S. could possibly do is send in troops. This is a U.N. problem, not the U.S.

Answer 9

It's a big and complicated mess; the US has no direct interest in it, and is pretty much tied up with more important concerns such as Iraq.

Answer 10

Busy with the troubles in Mogadishu I think.

Answer 11

Because if we did everybody would be criticizing us for doing so.

The Europeans are the people who created that mess - let them clean it up.